Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scorched Earth"
Sarna News
m |
m (Frabby moved page Talk:Scorched Earth WWE 2017 (ATOW) to Talk:Scorched Earth without leaving a redirect: Page merger) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Saw that myself and thought the same. Maybe because it has been developed by the Demo team somebody has jumped the gun--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 08:41, 12 December 2017 (EST) | :Saw that myself and thought the same. Maybe because it has been developed by the Demo team somebody has jumped the gun--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 08:41, 12 December 2017 (EST) | ||
::[http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=59334.msg1363538#msg1363538 The question about the event was asked] if it was canon, it is not due to fact it wasn't done by staff. As of this writing it has no been canonized. If that happens, then we can do something about it. It really too bad, it's wonderful supplement. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 21:00, 12 December 2017 (EST) | ::[http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=59334.msg1363538#msg1363538 The question about the event was asked] if it was canon, it is not due to fact it wasn't done by staff. As of this writing it has no been canonized. If that happens, then we can do something about it. It really too bad, it's wonderful supplement. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 21:00, 12 December 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | :::Wow, I had totally missed that caveat. GreyWolfActual explicitly confirmed my question (in the thread linked above) that this WWE was in no way endorsed by CGL, which means it's not canon. Based on the Catalyst Demo Team still being, well, the Catalyst Demo Team, the WWE has an - albeit weak - claim to being apocryphal. I'll rework the articles accordingly.<br />Good job finding this Wrangler! [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 03:30, 14 December 2017 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:44, 14 December 2017
Canon Status?[edit]
The article states that the scenario is not canonical at this time. Why? It does meet all current criteria for a canonical publication. Frabby (talk) 03:56, 12 December 2017 (EST)
- Saw that myself and thought the same. Maybe because it has been developed by the Demo team somebody has jumped the gun--Dmon (talk) 08:41, 12 December 2017 (EST)
- The question about the event was asked if it was canon, it is not due to fact it wasn't done by staff. As of this writing it has no been canonized. If that happens, then we can do something about it. It really too bad, it's wonderful supplement. -- Wrangler (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2017 (EST)
- Wow, I had totally missed that caveat. GreyWolfActual explicitly confirmed my question (in the thread linked above) that this WWE was in no way endorsed by CGL, which means it's not canon. Based on the Catalyst Demo Team still being, well, the Catalyst Demo Team, the WWE has an - albeit weak - claim to being apocryphal. I'll rework the articles accordingly.
Good job finding this Wrangler! Frabby (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2017 (EST)
- Wow, I had totally missed that caveat. GreyWolfActual explicitly confirmed my question (in the thread linked above) that this WWE was in no way endorsed by CGL, which means it's not canon. Based on the Catalyst Demo Team still being, well, the Catalyst Demo Team, the WWE has an - albeit weak - claim to being apocryphal. I'll rework the articles accordingly.
- The question about the event was asked if it was canon, it is not due to fact it wasn't done by staff. As of this writing it has no been canonized. If that happens, then we can do something about it. It really too bad, it's wonderful supplement. -- Wrangler (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2017 (EST)