Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sigma Galaxy (Clan Wolf)"
Dark Jaguar (talk | contribs) (→Issues: new section) |
BobTheZombie (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The main issue with Sigma Galaxy is the early history. Sigma Galaxy in Objective Raids is a misidentification of Epsilon Galaxy (the Cluster composition confirms this). So unless Epsilon was renamed Sigma after Tukayyid (and I can see no reference) the early history belongs to Epsilon. This error is continued into Field Manual: Crusader Clans (See Delta Galaxy). [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 04:04, 22 June 2016 (PDT) | The main issue with Sigma Galaxy is the early history. Sigma Galaxy in Objective Raids is a misidentification of Epsilon Galaxy (the Cluster composition confirms this). So unless Epsilon was renamed Sigma after Tukayyid (and I can see no reference) the early history belongs to Epsilon. This error is continued into Field Manual: Crusader Clans (See Delta Galaxy). [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 04:04, 22 June 2016 (PDT) | ||
+ | :Perhaps this should be explained in a "notes" section at the bottom of the article? -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 12:55, 22 June 2016 (PDT) |
Revision as of 15:55, 22 June 2016
Issues
The main issue with Sigma Galaxy is the early history. Sigma Galaxy in Objective Raids is a misidentification of Epsilon Galaxy (the Cluster composition confirms this). So unless Epsilon was renamed Sigma after Tukayyid (and I can see no reference) the early history belongs to Epsilon. This error is continued into Field Manual: Crusader Clans (See Delta Galaxy). Dark Jaguar (talk) 04:04, 22 June 2016 (PDT)
- Perhaps this should be explained in a "notes" section at the bottom of the article? -BobTheZombie (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2016 (PDT)