Difference between revisions of "Talk:Splat cat"
Sarna News
m (→MWO Fan term) |
(Response) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Me too. Maybe it is worth to mention it in the Notes section of the [[Catapult|Catapult article]].[[User:Harry|Harry]] ([[User talk:Harry|talk]]) 15:36, 18 March 2013 (PDT) | :Me too. Maybe it is worth to mention it in the Notes section of the [[Catapult|Catapult article]].[[User:Harry|Harry]] ([[User talk:Harry|talk]]) 15:36, 18 March 2013 (PDT) | ||
::I think that if this belongs anywhere, it's in a lexicon page attatched to the MWO page - given that we don't tend to even have seperate pages for terms like ''[[hegira]]'' and ''[[isorla]]'' but instead link to a general lexicon, expanding sarna to include fan-generated nicknames for particular variants in a tertiary product makes us less of a BattleTech wiki and more of an Urban Dictionary. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 00:40, 19 March 2013 (PDT) | ::I think that if this belongs anywhere, it's in a lexicon page attatched to the MWO page - given that we don't tend to even have seperate pages for terms like ''[[hegira]]'' and ''[[isorla]]'' but instead link to a general lexicon, expanding sarna to include fan-generated nicknames for particular variants in a tertiary product makes us less of a BattleTech wiki and more of an Urban Dictionary. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 00:40, 19 March 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | :::Didn't know about it being a MWO fan term. In that case it does fall under BTW's purview; we're ''not'', imho, restricted to a "table top focus" as per our [[Policy:Notability]]. Sarna aims to include any and all BattleTech. That said, the term's notability is arguable. I tend to agree with Harry: A note within the ''[[Catapult]]'' article may be the best solution. This article here should perhaps be made a redirect. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 01:24, 19 March 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:24, 19 March 2013
MWO Fan term
Splat cat is a MWO fan term, and really beyond the scope of the table top focused Sarna. Agree to deletion. Cyc (talk) 15:02, 18 March 2013 (PDT)
- Me too. Maybe it is worth to mention it in the Notes section of the Catapult article.Harry (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2013 (PDT)
- I think that if this belongs anywhere, it's in a lexicon page attatched to the MWO page - given that we don't tend to even have seperate pages for terms like hegira and isorla but instead link to a general lexicon, expanding sarna to include fan-generated nicknames for particular variants in a tertiary product makes us less of a BattleTech wiki and more of an Urban Dictionary. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:40, 19 March 2013 (PDT)
- Didn't know about it being a MWO fan term. In that case it does fall under BTW's purview; we're not, imho, restricted to a "table top focus" as per our Policy:Notability. Sarna aims to include any and all BattleTech. That said, the term's notability is arguable. I tend to agree with Harry: A note within the Catapult article may be the best solution. This article here should perhaps be made a redirect. Frabby (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2013 (PDT)
- I think that if this belongs anywhere, it's in a lexicon page attatched to the MWO page - given that we don't tend to even have seperate pages for terms like hegira and isorla but instead link to a general lexicon, expanding sarna to include fan-generated nicknames for particular variants in a tertiary product makes us less of a BattleTech wiki and more of an Urban Dictionary. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:40, 19 March 2013 (PDT)