Difference between revisions of "Talk:Valiant Vehicles"
Csdavis715 (talk | contribs) |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Strange to reply here 11 years later, but I also have concerns about this article. There is only one canon source of "Valiant Vehicles" and it's in TRO:3058U p. 104 about the Pilum tank. It refers to it as being a counterpart to the Striker tank, which was the joint venture between Valiant Systems and Wunderland, but the TROs for the Striker only give these 2 companies, and Valiant Vehicles is never specifically mentioned as being the division name. | :Strange to reply here 11 years later, but I also have concerns about this article. There is only one canon source of "Valiant Vehicles" and it's in TRO:3058U p. 104 about the Pilum tank. It refers to it as being a counterpart to the Striker tank, which was the joint venture between Valiant Systems and Wunderland, but the TROs for the Striker only give these 2 companies, and Valiant Vehicles is never specifically mentioned as being the division name. | ||
:The article is written as though Valiant Systems was supposed to be Valiant Vehicles for all the components listed, and I think that's a stretch. So I would also recommend merging this page. My feeling is that "Vehicles" was a typo and should have been "Systems," but we can consider it a division of the latter so long as we follow the canon we actually have on the rest. [[User:Csdavis715|Csdavis715]] ([[User talk:Csdavis715|talk]]) 12:43, 3 April 2024 (EDT) | :The article is written as though Valiant Systems was supposed to be Valiant Vehicles for all the components listed, and I think that's a stretch. So I would also recommend merging this page. My feeling is that "Vehicles" was a typo and should have been "Systems," but we can consider it a division of the latter so long as we follow the canon we actually have on the rest. [[User:Csdavis715|Csdavis715]] ([[User talk:Csdavis715|talk]]) 12:43, 3 April 2024 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::It would be worth raising an ATW question to confirm if the mention of Valiant Vehicles in TRO:3058U is an error/typo. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:51, 3 April 2024 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 12:51, 3 April 2024
Merge Proposal[edit]
I think this article needs to be merged into the Valiant Systems article; Valiant Vehicles may have started out as a joint concern, but by Objectives: Federated Suns it was operating under the name Valiant Systems, and the detail here is largely duplicated in the Valiant Systems article already. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 09:57, 2 January 2013 (PST)
- Strange to reply here 11 years later, but I also have concerns about this article. There is only one canon source of "Valiant Vehicles" and it's in TRO:3058U p. 104 about the Pilum tank. It refers to it as being a counterpart to the Striker tank, which was the joint venture between Valiant Systems and Wunderland, but the TROs for the Striker only give these 2 companies, and Valiant Vehicles is never specifically mentioned as being the division name.
- The article is written as though Valiant Systems was supposed to be Valiant Vehicles for all the components listed, and I think that's a stretch. So I would also recommend merging this page. My feeling is that "Vehicles" was a typo and should have been "Systems," but we can consider it a division of the latter so long as we follow the canon we actually have on the rest. Csdavis715 (talk) 12:43, 3 April 2024 (EDT)
- It would be worth raising an ATW question to confirm if the mention of Valiant Vehicles in TRO:3058U is an error/typo. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:51, 3 April 2024 (EDT)