User talk:Bheiss

• Thanks a lot for those new articles. Anything that can be provided helps fill in the gaps, and if you hadn't started Aidan Pryde, Clan Smoke Jaguar and IlKhan, it may have been awhile before anyone else got to them. Great to have you aboard. --Revanche 15:27, 17 October 2006 (CDT)

• Welcome Bheiss! Thanks for the contributions! I'm wondering if some of the terms such as Codex and Trueborn might fit better under the Dictionary. But, I guess we don't have an official policies on what should be its own article and what should be in the dictionary. However, I think Codex and Trueborn are terms rather than people/places/events/things, so they might fit better. What do you think? Nicjansma 19:24, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
  • (moved) I don't know if this is where I should respond, please tell me if this is right. Would the concepts of codex, etc in the dictionary be linked to the pedia so that if from the Home page search box, if someone entered Codex, it would go straight there? If not that I think concepts like this should be in the Pedia. This idea is great by the way. Amazing! - Bheiss
    • Keeping the response next to the thread that started it works a bit easier for following replies. Please also make sure to sign your posts (put four tildes after your text ~~~~ and it automagically puts your name and date/time. Nicjansma 19:45, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
    • What we could do is still have the articles for Codex, but as the text of the Codex article we use the #REDIRECT [[Dictionary#C]] tag to redirect to the dictionary. That way, users can enter codex, but they're automatically redirected to the dictionary. I envision the dictionary as holding terms a paragraph and smaller, while articles hold terms that need more than one paragraph. Nicjansma 19:45, 17 October 2006 (CDT)

Sounds good. Thanks for the help. What really needs to be done on this Wiki?

Bheiss 19:56, 17 October 2006 (CDT)