Difference between revisions of "User talk:Henryjones000"
(→Duplicate articles: Resp) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::::Old Name -> New Name. I get the feeling the Developers have it out for the CapCon. This doesn't happen to the others. [[User:Henryjones000|Henryjones000]] ([[User talk:Henryjones000|talk]]) 13:59, 15 April 2017 (EDT) | ::::Old Name -> New Name. I get the feeling the Developers have it out for the CapCon. This doesn't happen to the others. [[User:Henryjones000|Henryjones000]] ([[User talk:Henryjones000|talk]]) 13:59, 15 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::::Looking at the new names I would say that the powers that be (and the CCAF) are trying to make sense of their slightly wonky naming structure and create actual uniform brigades for their units. A good move if ever there was one.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 14:29, 15 April 2017 (EDT) | :::::Looking at the new names I would say that the powers that be (and the CCAF) are trying to make sense of their slightly wonky naming structure and create actual uniform brigades for their units. A good move if ever there was one.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 14:29, 15 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::::::You are probably correct. If you have time, please tell me how to do that. Thank you for your help. No doubt I will add more to the list as I find them. [[User:Henryjones000|Henryjones000]] ([[User talk:Henryjones000|talk]]) 14:33, 15 April 2017 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:33, 15 April 2017
Welcome
Duplicate articles
Hi,
just wanted to say that I saw your flagging of this issue on the Admin page and my talk page. I'm travelling over the holidays and can't currently delve into the matter, but I'll look into this once I'm back to my desk.
The usual way would be for all articles save one being turned into redirects, with the lead article being named after the last/latest name of the unit in question. Frabby (talk) 06:45, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Ok. I don't know how to do that. Can I leave that to you?Henryjones000 (talk) 06:59, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Found another one. 1st St. Ives Cheveau Legers is the same as the St. Ives Cheveau Legers.
- Hey Henryjones000... Instead of commenting on the talk page of every unit, create me a little list here and I will help out. St. Ives Cheveau Legers should be correct now. feel free to have a look.--Dmon (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Ouch. Sorry but the new name is FIRST ST. IVES CHEVEAU-LÉGERS. You used the old name.Henryjones000 (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Roman's Mounted Fusiliers -> 1st St. Ives Sentinels. Devon's Armored Infantry -> 2nd St. Ives Sentinels. Victoria Commonality Rangers -> Victoria Rangers. St. Ives Cheveau Legers -> FIRST ST. IVES CHEVEAU-LÉGERS. Kingston's Rangers -> 1st Victoria Rangers. Sung’s Rangers -> 2nd Victoria Rangers.
- Old Name -> New Name. I get the feeling the Developers have it out for the CapCon. This doesn't happen to the others. Henryjones000 (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Looking at the new names I would say that the powers that be (and the CCAF) are trying to make sense of their slightly wonky naming structure and create actual uniform brigades for their units. A good move if ever there was one.--Dmon (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- You are probably correct. If you have time, please tell me how to do that. Thank you for your help. No doubt I will add more to the list as I find them. Henryjones000 (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Looking at the new names I would say that the powers that be (and the CCAF) are trying to make sense of their slightly wonky naming structure and create actual uniform brigades for their units. A good move if ever there was one.--Dmon (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Hey Henryjones000... Instead of commenting on the talk page of every unit, create me a little list here and I will help out. St. Ives Cheveau Legers should be correct now. feel free to have a look.--Dmon (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2017 (EDT)
- Found another one. 1st St. Ives Cheveau Legers is the same as the St. Ives Cheveau Legers.