Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki:Requests for comment/Archive"
Sarna News
(→<big>Requests for Comments:</big>: spacing) |
(new category proposal) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*[[Talk:Neveron]]: as to what constitutes a valid external link to a 'for-profit' product. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:59, 19 December 2007 (CST) | *[[Talk:Neveron]]: as to what constitutes a valid external link to a 'for-profit' product. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:59, 19 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Talk:Concord of Kapteyn]]: Proposal for a new category covering laws, treaties, etc. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 20:20, 19 January 2008 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 19 January 2008
The Request for Comment forum allows Editors to introduce an issue that may have sprung up either in a high-traffic area (ex: Project:BattleMech) or somewhere more obscure (ex:2418), but may require a third, fourth or even twenty-third opinion. This allows a community consensus to be formed through discussion and may affect more than just the article being discussed.
Useage: Introduce a new entry with an asterisk (*), right below the dividing line and above the previous entry. Start it off with a link to the discussion page of the article in question, and a very brief summary of the issue being discussed. Remember to sign the entry (with four tildes: ~~~~). Please do not add an opinion to the summary here.
Acceptable Example:
- Policy Talk:Notability: discussion as to what shall be done with articles deemed non-notable. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:55, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Unacceptable Example:
- Policy Talk:Notability: Some spammer wants to create an article about himself, just because he wrote some fan-boy story about Peder Smythe. Let's 'explain' to him why that won't fly. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:55, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Requests for Comments:
Add comments here (above the previous entry)
- Talk:Elemental: Regarding the status of the cleanup tag on the article. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 07:31, 20 December 2007 (CST)
- Talk:Neveron: as to what constitutes a valid external link to a 'for-profit' product. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:59, 19 December 2007 (CST)
- Talk:Concord of Kapteyn: Proposal for a new category covering laws, treaties, etc. --Scaletail 20:20, 19 January 2008 (CST)