Difference between revisions of "Information:The perfect article"
Sarna News
(imported) |
m (Deadfire moved page BattleTechWiki:The perfect article to Information:The perfect article: Moving to the correct namespace for this) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Information page|BTW:PERFECT|I:PERFECT}} | |
| + | <big>'''A perfect BattleTechWiki article…'''</big> | ||
| − | *'''starts with a clear description''' of the subject; the | + | *'''starts with a clear description''' of the subject; the lead introduces and explains the subject and its significance clearly and accurately, without going into excessive detail. |
*'''is understandable'''; it is clearly expressed for both experts and non-experts in appropriate detail, and thoroughly explores and explains the subject. | *'''is understandable'''; it is clearly expressed for both experts and non-experts in appropriate detail, and thoroughly explores and explains the subject. | ||
*'''is nearly self-contained'''; it includes essential information and terminology, and is comprehensible by itself, without requiring significant reading of other articles. | *'''is nearly self-contained'''; it includes essential information and terminology, and is comprehensible by itself, without requiring significant reading of other articles. | ||
| − | *'''branches out'''; it contains | + | |
| + | *'''branches out'''; it contains wikilinks and sources to other articles and external information that add meaning to the subject. | ||
*'''acknowledges and explores all aspects of the subject'''; i.e., it covers every encyclopedic angle of the subject. | *'''acknowledges and explores all aspects of the subject'''; i.e., it covers every encyclopedic angle of the subject. | ||
| − | *'''is completely neutral and unbiased'''; it has a | + | *'''is completely neutral and unbiased'''; it has a neutral point of view, presenting competing views on controversies logically and fairly, and pointing out all sides without favoring particular viewpoints. The most factual and accepted views are emphasized, and minority views are given a lower priority; sufficient information and references are provided so that readers can learn more about particular views. |
| − | *'''is of an appropriate length'''; it is | + | |
| + | *'''is of an appropriate length'''; it is long enough to provide sufficient information, depth, and analysis on its subject, without including unnecessary detail or information that would be more suitable in "subarticles" or related articles. | ||
*'''reflects expert knowledge'''; it is grounded in fact and on sound scholarly and logical principles. | *'''reflects expert knowledge'''; it is grounded in fact and on sound scholarly and logical principles. | ||
*'''is precise and explicit'''; it is free of vague generalities and half-truths that may arise from an imperfect grasp of the subject. | *'''is precise and explicit'''; it is free of vague generalities and half-truths that may arise from an imperfect grasp of the subject. | ||
| − | *'''is well-documented'''; all facts are | + | |
| + | *'''is well-documented'''; all facts are cited from reputable sources, preferably sources that are accessible and up-to-date. | ||
*'''is clear'''; it is written to avoid ambiguity and misunderstanding, using logical structure, and plain, clear prose; it is free of redundant language. | *'''is clear'''; it is written to avoid ambiguity and misunderstanding, using logical structure, and plain, clear prose; it is free of redundant language. | ||
*'''is engaging'''; the language is descriptive and has an interesting, encyclopedic tone. | *'''is engaging'''; the language is descriptive and has an interesting, encyclopedic tone. | ||
| + | |||
*'''follows standard writing conventions''' of modern English, including correct grammar, punctuation and spelling. | *'''follows standard writing conventions''' of modern English, including correct grammar, punctuation and spelling. | ||
| − | *'''includes informative, relevant images''' | + | *'''includes informative, relevant images''' — including maps, portraits, photographs and artworks—that add to a reader's interest or understanding of the text, but not so many as to detract from it. Each image should have an explanatory caption. |
| − | *'''may not be attainable'''. Editing may bring an article closer to perfection, but ultimately, perfection means different things to different | + | *'''may not be attainable'''. Editing may bring an article closer to perfection, but ultimately, perfection means different things to different BattleTechWiki users. Perfection may not be achievable, but it's fun trying. For more information, see our [[Policy:Editing|editing policy]]. |
Latest revision as of 13:47, 22 April 2024
 | This is an information page. It is not one of BattleTechWiki's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of BattleTechWiki's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. |
A perfect BattleTechWiki article…
- starts with a clear description of the subject; the lead introduces and explains the subject and its significance clearly and accurately, without going into excessive detail.
- is understandable; it is clearly expressed for both experts and non-experts in appropriate detail, and thoroughly explores and explains the subject.
- is nearly self-contained; it includes essential information and terminology, and is comprehensible by itself, without requiring significant reading of other articles.
- branches out; it contains wikilinks and sources to other articles and external information that add meaning to the subject.
- acknowledges and explores all aspects of the subject; i.e., it covers every encyclopedic angle of the subject.
- is completely neutral and unbiased; it has a neutral point of view, presenting competing views on controversies logically and fairly, and pointing out all sides without favoring particular viewpoints. The most factual and accepted views are emphasized, and minority views are given a lower priority; sufficient information and references are provided so that readers can learn more about particular views.
- is of an appropriate length; it is long enough to provide sufficient information, depth, and analysis on its subject, without including unnecessary detail or information that would be more suitable in "subarticles" or related articles.
- reflects expert knowledge; it is grounded in fact and on sound scholarly and logical principles.
- is precise and explicit; it is free of vague generalities and half-truths that may arise from an imperfect grasp of the subject.
- is well-documented; all facts are cited from reputable sources, preferably sources that are accessible and up-to-date.
- is clear; it is written to avoid ambiguity and misunderstanding, using logical structure, and plain, clear prose; it is free of redundant language.
- is engaging; the language is descriptive and has an interesting, encyclopedic tone.
- follows standard writing conventions of modern English, including correct grammar, punctuation and spelling.
- includes informative, relevant images — including maps, portraits, photographs and artworks—that add to a reader's interest or understanding of the text, but not so many as to detract from it. Each image should have an explanatory caption.
- may not be attainable. Editing may bring an article closer to perfection, but ultimately, perfection means different things to different BattleTechWiki users. Perfection may not be achievable, but it's fun trying. For more information, see our editing policy.