Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Mercenary Commands"

m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::::I haven't explained myself well. I mean that in mercenary commands we only put the mercenary units, and inside the mercenary we put the links to the subunits, like we do for RCT for which when possible unit members are listed and linked; or with the Inner Sphere March Militia units.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 11:49, 15 December 2017 (EST)
 
::::I haven't explained myself well. I mean that in mercenary commands we only put the mercenary units, and inside the mercenary we put the links to the subunits, like we do for RCT for which when possible unit members are listed and linked; or with the Inner Sphere March Militia units.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 11:49, 15 December 2017 (EST)
 
:::::Ah, yes I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean in the ''category pages'' where the subunits appear under the parent unit?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:28, 15 December 2017 (EST)
 
:::::Ah, yes I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean in the ''category pages'' where the subunits appear under the parent unit?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:28, 15 December 2017 (EST)
 +
::::::I meant that we should only put there the big commands (like [[Kell Hounds]], and not the individual battlations there), and in the general article of the unit do something like the links we have in big commands: [[Syrtis Fusiliers]]

Revision as of 05:42, 16 December 2017

I feel there are a few "incorrect" links. I've seen that for example we have links to the Illirian Lancers... and also its subcommands. Shouldn't we have only single article and from there calling the individual units?

In what way are the links incorrect?--Dmon (talk) 06:18, 15 December 2017 (EST)
I feel we should link here only the global units, and link the subunits to the principal ones --Pserratv (talk) 09:59, 15 December 2017 (EST)
I feel the complete opposite. I feel pages like the Wolf's Dragoons especially are huge and massively over detailed. The info should be broken up into more manageable chunks in my opinion.--Dmon (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2017 (EST)
I haven't explained myself well. I mean that in mercenary commands we only put the mercenary units, and inside the mercenary we put the links to the subunits, like we do for RCT for which when possible unit members are listed and linked; or with the Inner Sphere March Militia units.--Pserratv (talk) 11:49, 15 December 2017 (EST)
Ah, yes I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean in the category pages where the subunits appear under the parent unit?--Dmon (talk) 12:28, 15 December 2017 (EST)
I meant that we should only put there the big commands (like Kell Hounds, and not the individual battlations there), and in the general article of the unit do something like the links we have in big commands: Syrtis Fusiliers