Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Structural Materials"

Line 2: Line 2:
 
The title of this category does not strike me as entierly accurate. '''Structural Materials''' made me think of much more base materials like Endo-Steel or the fact that 'Mech chassis use Titanium. Now I have had a look at the category, I do think the category itself is useful, but maybe rename it as something like '''Vehicle Components''' or something similar. I feel components is the correct term to use but I am undecided on what would be the best descriptive.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:55, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
 
The title of this category does not strike me as entierly accurate. '''Structural Materials''' made me think of much more base materials like Endo-Steel or the fact that 'Mech chassis use Titanium. Now I have had a look at the category, I do think the category itself is useful, but maybe rename it as something like '''Vehicle Components''' or something similar. I feel components is the correct term to use but I am undecided on what would be the best descriptive.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:55, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
 
:I would go on only '''Components''', as they can be also used for BattleMechs or Aerospace fighters.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 07:58, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
 
:I would go on only '''Components''', as they can be also used for BattleMechs or Aerospace fighters.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 07:58, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
 +
::Actually, if we remove Myomers (and possibly Gyros) we could go with '''Structural Components''' and have the engines, myomers, actuators etc as '''Motive Components''' if you still want to keep the spirit of this category in tact.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 08:59, 1 April 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:59, 1 April 2021

Title

The title of this category does not strike me as entierly accurate. Structural Materials made me think of much more base materials like Endo-Steel or the fact that 'Mech chassis use Titanium. Now I have had a look at the category, I do think the category itself is useful, but maybe rename it as something like Vehicle Components or something similar. I feel components is the correct term to use but I am undecided on what would be the best descriptive.--Dmon (talk) 07:55, 1 April 2021 (EDT)

I would go on only Components, as they can be also used for BattleMechs or Aerospace fighters.--Pserratv (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
Actually, if we remove Myomers (and possibly Gyros) we could go with Structural Components and have the engines, myomers, actuators etc as Motive Components if you still want to keep the spirit of this category in tact.--Dmon (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2021 (EDT)