Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Video Games"
Sarna News
(→Housekeeping: resp) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Ideally, each should be one article with maybe a "for more, see [[other article]]". So yeah, I agree with you. Someone just needs to step up and take charge, if that is where their interest is. You might also be interested in reading this [[Talk:MechWarrior I/Strategy Guide|recent convo]]. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | :Ideally, each should be one article with maybe a "for more, see [[other article]]". So yeah, I agree with you. Someone just needs to step up and take charge, if that is where their interest is. You might also be interested in reading this [[Talk:MechWarrior I/Strategy Guide|recent convo]]. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Right now I am on shift at work (five consecutive night shifts... oh the joy) but after I am finished I intend to polish up as many unit articles as I can. if after my next work cycle (so about two weeks) nobody has stepped up I will give it a crack. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 18:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 6 August 2009
Housekeeping
we have lots of articles in the Video Game Category all for the same things but most of them seem a bit random and lack any kind of real article. {eg Crescent Hawks Inception and its sub-articles Crescent Hawks Inception/Hacking Guide, Crescent Hawks Inception/Strategy Guide 1 & Crescent Hawks Inception/Strategy Guide 2. I propose that each Video game gets proper article just like any other article and a section at the bottom called RESOURCES much like we do now but instead of a list of links and downloads we have a wikilink to an article containing all the downloads, strategy guides and other more OOC technical stuff (eg Cresent Hawks Inception/Resources). This way each game would have a simple two pages rather than the multiple pages some have. --Dmon 17:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ideally, each should be one article with maybe a "for more, see other article". So yeah, I agree with you. Someone just needs to step up and take charge, if that is where their interest is. You might also be interested in reading this recent convo. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 18:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Right now I am on shift at work (five consecutive night shifts... oh the joy) but after I am finished I intend to polish up as many unit articles as I can. if after my next work cycle (so about two weeks) nobody has stepped up I will give it a crack. --Dmon 18:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)