Difference between revisions of "Monitor (naval concept)"
(Created - need to check on space station rules in SO, and on the Naga control ships to see if this is actually true) |
m (→Existing Monitors: added tag pipe to Sheridan, the link refers to the planet not to the vessel) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
==Existing Monitors== | ==Existing Monitors== | ||
Although the Monitor concept at large was refuted, a few isolated cases exist in canon that could be regarded as Monitors: | Although the Monitor concept at large was refuted, a few isolated cases exist in canon that could be regarded as Monitors: | ||
− | *The ''[[Bonaventure]]''-class corvette ''[[Sheridan]]'', as of [[3067]], operates as a training ship in the [[Sol]] system. It has had its jump drive removed to make room for a full second crew compliment and some training gear; however, it is unknown just how much of the jump drive was removed and how much room/mass the extra facilities take up. | + | *The ''[[Bonaventure]]''-class corvette ''[[Sheridan (Vessel)|Sheridan]]'', as of [[3067]], operates as a training ship in the [[Sol]] system. It has had its jump drive removed to make room for a full second crew compliment and some training gear; however, it is unknown just how much of the jump drive was removed and how much room/mass the extra facilities take up. |
*The modified ''[[Naga]]''-class [[SDS]] control ships in the [[Sol]] system, having no functional jump drive anymore, could arguably be described as monitors. | *The modified ''[[Naga]]''-class [[SDS]] control ships in the [[Sol]] system, having no functional jump drive anymore, could arguably be described as monitors. | ||
*[[Battlesat]] type space stations with (limited) thrust power could also arguably be described as monitors. It should be noted that they are legal under current construction rules, but have been rendered largely moot due to their limited movement. As a consequence, it is questionable if battlesats were deployed outside of the known canonical example in the [[Luthien]] system.<ref>As explained in [http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,28084.0.html this thread] on the official [[BattleTech forum]]</ref> | *[[Battlesat]] type space stations with (limited) thrust power could also arguably be described as monitors. It should be noted that they are legal under current construction rules, but have been rendered largely moot due to their limited movement. As a consequence, it is questionable if battlesats were deployed outside of the known canonical example in the [[Luthien]] system.<ref>As explained in [http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,28084.0.html this thread] on the official [[BattleTech forum]]</ref> |
Revision as of 18:46, 1 April 2013
- This article is about the spacecraft design concept. For the wet navy design, see Monitor.
Overview
In the context of BattleTech spacecraft, the term Monitor, although not clearly defined, is usually used to describe the concept of a WarShip without a jump drive core. This item has no tactical value in combat but typically makes up 47.5% of a given WarShip's mass. As a result of forgoing the jump drive, almost twice as much mass can be allocated to weapon, armor and other combat-relevant systems compared to regular WarShips of the same mass (size), making Monitors theoretically vastly more powerful on a ton-per-ton basis (with tonnage being the limiting factor in WarShip design).
No official rules
No official rules for Monitors exist. It should be noted that the very concept is breaking the aerospace construction rules, as WarShips (with their size limit of 2,500,000 tons) have to mount a jump drive by definition while non-jump capable vessels invariably have to be built either as DropShips (size limit of 100,000 tons) or even small craft (size limit of 200 tons). Space stations are by nature immobile structures and cannot mount tactical maneuvering thrusters like spaceships do.
The Monitor idea was pioneered by Gerald Hall in the MechForce magazine MechQuarterly (vol. 4, issue 2), an official but canon-wise only apocryphal BattleTech publication. His suggested construction rules for Monitors were incorporated into the official BattleTech design program, HeavyMetal Aero, but are not considered canonical in the sense of legal construction rules.
XTRO:Boondoggles
BattleTech Line Developer Herbert A. Beas II has repeatedly[1] stated that Monitors, if they existed, would outperform WarShips to the point where they would threaten game balance, and that Monitors were therefore kept out of BattleTech for game balancing reasons. To put the issue to rest, he solicited an entry for Monitors in Experimental Technical Readout: Boondoggles to showcase that, and why, the concept was not viable in the BattleTech universe. However, within days of publication fans pointed out on the BattleTech Forum that the entry as written actually proved the Monitor concept to be viable to a degree, describing a small number to have been built. In response to this, an erratum was published that completely replaces the initial entry in what technically constitutes a retcon (in the sense of altering canon).
The following is a direct transcript of the official erratum posting, re-published here with kind permission of the author, Herbert Beas:
“ | Hello,
The following errata applies to the entry titled "Monitors". Please replace ALL TEXT under this entry with the following:
We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you, - Herbert Beas |
” |
Existing Monitors
Although the Monitor concept at large was refuted, a few isolated cases exist in canon that could be regarded as Monitors:
- The Bonaventure-class corvette Sheridan, as of 3067, operates as a training ship in the Sol system. It has had its jump drive removed to make room for a full second crew compliment and some training gear; however, it is unknown just how much of the jump drive was removed and how much room/mass the extra facilities take up.
- The modified Naga-class SDS control ships in the Sol system, having no functional jump drive anymore, could arguably be described as monitors.
- Battlesat type space stations with (limited) thrust power could also arguably be described as monitors. It should be noted that they are legal under current construction rules, but have been rendered largely moot due to their limited movement. As a consequence, it is questionable if battlesats were deployed outside of the known canonical example in the Luthien system.[2]
References
- ↑ "Establishing that monitors never worked in the setting, however, was my intention.";
"We simply call those "broken" JumpShips and/or WarShips. Really, the point is that a "monitor" in BattleTech simply does not exist as a viable or in any way functional concept.";
"There never were any official monitor rules. That was the point of the entire exercise with XTR: Boondoggles; explaining why there never were any." - ↑ As explained in this thread on the official BattleTech forum