Difference between revisions of "Talk:3072"
(Response and correction) |
(Looks good) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::I've fixed format problem. I take responsiblity for the error. My entry got mixed in with Doneve's timeline entry he took from JHS:3076. Too many astriks -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 16:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | ::::I've fixed format problem. I take responsiblity for the error. My entry got mixed in with Doneve's timeline entry he took from JHS:3076. Too many astriks -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 16:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::::Looks good! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] |
Latest revision as of 23:59, 22 February 2010
Arc-Royal vs Benjamin[edit]
Question : The formatting on the page makes it seem like the 28th WoB Division and 45th WoB Shadow Division fought at Arc-Royal and not Benjamin. Was this intended or am i mis-reading it? ClanWolverine101
- Commenting, since I was the last to update the page. I really don't know myself, CW. I take issue with having anything more than simple statements on Year pages, with wikilinks for further info. I'd prefer each item to have a date (by month at a minimum). In the case you mention, it could be read as too much information regarding a Word of Blake attack force sent to Arc-Royal, or other events that also took place on March 22[nd]. It needs to be cleaned up and I know Ebakunin had an idea on how to standardize Year pages.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 15:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well, like I said, I'm pretty sure its just a formatting thing. ClanWolverine101
- I've fixed format problem. I take responsiblity for the error. My entry got mixed in with Doneve's timeline entry he took from JHS:3076. Too many astriks -- Wrangler 16:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good! ClanWolverine101