Difference between revisions of "Talk:99th Aerospace (Draconis Combine)"
Sarna News
(Resp) |
m (→Sub-Stub) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Sub-Stub== | ==Sub-Stub== | ||
This one I have regrets about adding to the sub-stub category, because it does have the tree. However, without a source listed, there are well over 100 references in which it could have 2 mms of space, thereby making any chance it'll ever be developed too slim. Boils down to 'no information', as what little is here (the tree) is completely unverifiable. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | This one I have regrets about adding to the sub-stub category, because it does have the tree. However, without a source listed, there are well over 100 references in which it could have 2 mms of space, thereby making any chance it'll ever be developed too slim. Boils down to 'no information', as what little is here (the tree) is completely unverifiable. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Oops... | + | :Oops... Not sure why I didnt put a ref in this one?, still a little fleshed more fleshed out now. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 13:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:55, 4 March 2010
Sub-Stub
This one I have regrets about adding to the sub-stub category, because it does have the tree. However, without a source listed, there are well over 100 references in which it could have 2 mms of space, thereby making any chance it'll ever be developed too slim. Boils down to 'no information', as what little is here (the tree) is completely unverifiable. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 22:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oops... Not sure why I didnt put a ref in this one?, still a little fleshed more fleshed out now. --Dmon 13:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)