Difference between revisions of "Talk:BattleCorps Ship Profiles"
Sarna News
m |
m (→Spelling) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I've added individual ship profiles with the ''exact same'' spelling as BC used - which may include spelling errors or, more frequently, odd capitalisations. Now I'm torn - should the article use the "correct" spelling/format, or should we stick to the exact same format as BC including obvious errors? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 14:04, 4 October 2012 (PDT) | I've added individual ship profiles with the ''exact same'' spelling as BC used - which may include spelling errors or, more frequently, odd capitalisations. Now I'm torn - should the article use the "correct" spelling/format, or should we stick to the exact same format as BC including obvious errors? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 14:04, 4 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
:I stick a little bit my nose in this discussion, the best way is, we use a correct spelling without spelling errors and so on. When i take a look in the latest CGL sourcebooks, i don't understand the developers in many way's, a book or sourcebook was new developed but they need a errata forum, why, why, i found this problem in all later publications, i don't understand this way, when i produce a product i have fact checkers etc. etc., and the chekers must see some errors or indescrepancy and so on, but to many errors found there way in the pdf's and hard copies, but this is my point of view.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 14:38, 4 October 2012 (PDT) | :I stick a little bit my nose in this discussion, the best way is, we use a correct spelling without spelling errors and so on. When i take a look in the latest CGL sourcebooks, i don't understand the developers in many way's, a book or sourcebook was new developed but they need a errata forum, why, why, i found this problem in all later publications, i don't understand this way, when i produce a product i have fact checkers etc. etc., and the chekers must see some errors or indescrepancy and so on, but to many errors found there way in the pdf's and hard copies, but this is my point of view.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 14:38, 4 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::I think we should use the proper spelling of ship names and state prefixes (which is why I changed them). In every other source I've seen from CGL, the state abbreviations are always capitalized. To me that means that the PDF's were released with an error that would be corrected in an Errata document. So by using the correct capitalization and spelling, we're actually doing the right thing.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:19, 5 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:19, 5 October 2012
Spelling
I've added individual ship profiles with the exact same spelling as BC used - which may include spelling errors or, more frequently, odd capitalisations. Now I'm torn - should the article use the "correct" spelling/format, or should we stick to the exact same format as BC including obvious errors? Frabby (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2012 (PDT)
- I stick a little bit my nose in this discussion, the best way is, we use a correct spelling without spelling errors and so on. When i take a look in the latest CGL sourcebooks, i don't understand the developers in many way's, a book or sourcebook was new developed but they need a errata forum, why, why, i found this problem in all later publications, i don't understand this way, when i produce a product i have fact checkers etc. etc., and the chekers must see some errors or indescrepancy and so on, but to many errors found there way in the pdf's and hard copies, but this is my point of view.--Doneve (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2012 (PDT)
- I think we should use the proper spelling of ship names and state prefixes (which is why I changed them). In every other source I've seen from CGL, the state abbreviations are always capitalized. To me that means that the PDF's were released with an error that would be corrected in an Errata document. So by using the correct capitalization and spelling, we're actually doing the right thing.--Mbear(talk) 05:19, 5 October 2012 (PDT)