Difference between revisions of "Talk:Head Hunting"

Line 5: Line 5:
 
:::Still not feeling it with this article, virtually every scrap of BT relevant information could be better served as part of a character article or the start of a battle article.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:22, 17 September 2019 (EDT)
 
:::Still not feeling it with this article, virtually every scrap of BT relevant information could be better served as part of a character article or the start of a battle article.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:22, 17 September 2019 (EDT)
 
::::As I was saying, this was me trying to make a page that by definition doesn't look right.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 07:31, 17 September 2019 (EDT)
 
::::As I was saying, this was me trying to make a page that by definition doesn't look right.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 07:31, 17 September 2019 (EDT)
 +
:::::I disagree completely. This should probably be considered an (albeit extremely rare) BattleMech role, and kept as part of that. Also, as a user who didn't know much about Head Hunting in BattleTech, it is a very useful article that doesn't require one to know the steps the development of this role took beforehand. --[[Windchild|Windchild]] ([[User Windchild|talk]]) 09:34, 5 February 2020 (EST)

Revision as of 10:36, 5 February 2020

Purpose?

I kind of feel that this might be a little pointless as an article. The concept of headhunting is far from unique to BattleTech. It in fact has been a fairly standard military practice for thousands of years. This article does not really reflect that, nor does it really do anything else useful in my opinion.--Dmon (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2019 (EDT)

I agree. Headhunting isn't something that is specific to BattleTech (the article even says as much), and the topic as such doesn't, imho, warrant an article here, as per Policy:Notability. Or did I miss something? Frabby (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
I've tried to give some battletech flavor to this article, can you review. Not sure though it is enough to save it.--Pserratv (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
Still not feeling it with this article, virtually every scrap of BT relevant information could be better served as part of a character article or the start of a battle article.--Dmon (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2019 (EDT)
As I was saying, this was me trying to make a page that by definition doesn't look right.--Pserratv (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2019 (EDT)
I disagree completely. This should probably be considered an (albeit extremely rare) BattleMech role, and kept as part of that. Also, as a user who didn't know much about Head Hunting in BattleTech, it is a very useful article that doesn't require one to know the steps the development of this role took beforehand. --Windchild (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2020 (EST)