Difference between revisions of "Talk:Orion"
Sarna News
BobTheZombie (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Inconsistencies== | ==Inconsistencies== | ||
In the variants section, should it be in the present or past tense? It seems to switch around a lot. [[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 08:31, 26 June 2013 (PDT) | In the variants section, should it be in the present or past tense? It seems to switch around a lot. [[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 08:31, 26 June 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | :I've always been under the impression that Sarna endeavours to use the past tense where possible, but I can't remember seeing it documented anywhere. Frabby's a good person to ask... [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 09:32, 26 June 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:32, 26 June 2013
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Introduction
I notice in Era Digest: Age of War the introduction is dated in 2456 and in the 'mech article, the first building is in 2570, hmm i think this is a very long time stretch about the two dates, any thoughts.--Doneve 03:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Inconsistencies
In the variants section, should it be in the present or past tense? It seems to switch around a lot. BobTheZombie (talk) 08:31, 26 June 2013 (PDT)
- I've always been under the impression that Sarna endeavours to use the past tense where possible, but I can't remember seeing it documented anywhere. Frabby's a good person to ask... BrokenMnemonic (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2013 (PDT)