Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Fourth Succession War Era Military Operations"

(Resp.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Proposal==
 
==Proposal==
 
I believe this category is necessary and useful, but i want to hear what other editors think. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:32, 2 February 2015 (PST)
 
I believe this category is necessary and useful, but i want to hear what other editors think. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:32, 2 February 2015 (PST)
:Personally I think it is a bit pointless as a singular category. Either we need one for each of the Succession Wars or just a single era wide one. I favour the single era category.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:28, 3 February 2015 (PST)
+
:Personally I think it is a bit pointless as a singular category. Either we need one for each of the Succession Wars or just a single era wide one. I favor the single era category.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:28, 3 February 2015 (PST)
 +
::Changed my mind, in hindsight I now thing given the number of operations in the era we need war specic ones. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:20, 24 March 2018 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 12:20, 24 March 2018

Proposal[edit]

I believe this category is necessary and useful, but i want to hear what other editors think. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2015 (PST)

Personally I think it is a bit pointless as a singular category. Either we need one for each of the Succession Wars or just a single era wide one. I favor the single era category.--Dmon (talk) 07:28, 3 February 2015 (PST)
Changed my mind, in hindsight I now thing given the number of operations in the era we need war specic ones. --Dmon (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2018 (EDT)