Difference between revisions of "Talk:3025 Units"

(Resp)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::I feel we can delete the page, but its my opinion.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 00:01, 4 October 2015 (PDT)
 
::I feel we can delete the page, but its my opinion.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 00:01, 4 October 2015 (PDT)
 
: Please invite the user to the discussion; give a few days to comment. After that, develop (involved consensus) and feel free to take action. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:33, 4 October 2015 (PDT)
 
: Please invite the user to the discussion; give a few days to comment. After that, develop (involved consensus) and feel free to take action. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:33, 4 October 2015 (PDT)
 +
:::Think it is safe to say this article is good to be deleted.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:09, 12 September 2017 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 19:09, 12 September 2017

Notability[edit]

I have to question the notability and usefulness of this article. The MUL already gives this kind of information and it's even a direct, canonical and free resource. There is no point for Sarna in trying to out-MUL the MUL. Frabby (talk) 12:49, 3 October 2015 (PDT)

Also, it is missing the downgraded Star League designs if it is supposed to be all level 1 3025 'Mechs. I think it's best to leave this type of listing to the MUL. --Cache (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2015 (PDT)
I feel we can delete the page, but its my opinion.--Doneve (talk) 00:01, 4 October 2015 (PDT)
Please invite the user to the discussion; give a few days to comment. After that, develop (involved consensus) and feel free to take action. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 09:33, 4 October 2015 (PDT)
Think it is safe to say this article is good to be deleted.--Dmon (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2017 (EDT)