Difference between revisions of "Talk:Awesome"
m |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::To be fair, certain apocryphal sources are acceptable, if not directly contradicted. I am *NOT* saying MWO is one of those, mind you. See the [[canon]] article for details. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 20:05, 10 February 2013 (PST) | :::To be fair, certain apocryphal sources are acceptable, if not directly contradicted. I am *NOT* saying MWO is one of those, mind you. See the [[canon]] article for details. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 20:05, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
::::I've heard one of the 3025 TROs had them, but I don't have them in front of me now.--[[User:Seth|Seth]] ([[User talk:Seth|talk]]) 23:01, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ::::I've heard one of the 3025 TROs had them, but I don't have them in front of me now.--[[User:Seth|Seth]] ([[User talk:Seth|talk]]) 23:01, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
+ | ALL apocryphal sources are acceptable (see [[Policy:Notability]]), with the caveat that apocryphal material must be tagged accordingly (see [[Policy:Canon]]). If and when the ''Pretty Baby'' appears as a MWO Hero Mech it deserves a notion. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 23:36, 10 February 2013 (PST) |
Revision as of 03:36, 11 February 2013
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Awesome "Pretty Baby"
Anyone know where Pretty Baby came from? Supposedly it's canon, but it was only added to Sarna in response to PGI announcing its inclusion in MWO. -SilverlightPony (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- Looks like someone decided to add it to the custom variants. MWO is not canon source so i'm pulling it out of the article. Unless a Record Sheet or offical source is published by Catayst Game Labs, it can't be in the article. - Wrangler (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- To be fair, certain apocryphal sources are acceptable, if not directly contradicted. I am *NOT* saying MWO is one of those, mind you. See the canon article for details. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- Looks like someone decided to add it to the custom variants. MWO is not canon source so i'm pulling it out of the article. Unless a Record Sheet or offical source is published by Catayst Game Labs, it can't be in the article. - Wrangler (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2013 (PST)
ALL apocryphal sources are acceptable (see Policy:Notability), with the caveat that apocryphal material must be tagged accordingly (see Policy:Canon). If and when the Pretty Baby appears as a MWO Hero Mech it deserves a notion. Frabby (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2013 (PST)