Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dismal Disinherited"

(→‎Split Up?: no, there was no consensus)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:: Meh - when I suggested Merc units should all fall under a single article (see Wolf's Dragoons?), others objected. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 22:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:: Meh - when I suggested Merc units should all fall under a single article (see Wolf's Dragoons?), others objected. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 22:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::No, there was no consensus reached at [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Military_Commands#Policy_Needed]]. The discussion just fizzled, which means it's still being handled on an ''ad hoc'' basis. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::No, there was no consensus reached at [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Military_Commands#Policy_Needed]]. The discussion just fizzled, which means it's still being handled on an ''ad hoc'' basis. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::: Touche'. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 04:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:22, 13 May 2010

Split Up?

Question : Should this article not be split up? I thought consensus was reached that each regiment would have its own page. Just a thought. ClanWolverine101 20:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I agree that something has to be done... but with the thing for keeping Merc units in one article, total re-write? --Dmon 20:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Meh - when I suggested Merc units should all fall under a single article (see Wolf's Dragoons?), others objected. ClanWolverine101 22:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
No, there was no consensus reached at BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Military_Commands#Policy_Needed. The discussion just fizzled, which means it's still being handled on an ad hoc basis. --Scaletail 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Touche'. ClanWolverine101 04:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)