Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dismal Disinherited"
m (WP:MC) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{WikiProject Military Commands|tr=new}} | ||
== Split Up? == | == Split Up? == | ||
Question : Should this article not be split up? I thought consensus was reached that each regiment would have its own page. Just a thought. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 20:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | Question : Should this article not be split up? I thought consensus was reached that each regiment would have its own page. Just a thought. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 20:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I agree that something has to be done... but with the thing for keeping Merc units in one article, total re-write? --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 20:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | :I agree that something has to be done... but with the thing for keeping Merc units in one article, total re-write? --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 20:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :: Meh - when I suggested Merc units should all fall under a single article (see Wolf's Dragoons?), others objected. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 22:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::No, there was no consensus reached at [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Military_Commands#Policy_Needed]]. The discussion just fizzled, which means it's still being handled on an ''ad hoc'' basis. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::: Touche'. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 04:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | Weather it is broken up or kept as one article is not of real importance.. the article is a mess and needs to be cleaned up. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 08:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I did some spelling and grammar corrections but I do not have access to source mats to do a full clean up[[User:Deeppockets|Deeppockets]] 23:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:08, 23 July 2010
Split Up?[edit]
Question : Should this article not be split up? I thought consensus was reached that each regiment would have its own page. Just a thought. ClanWolverine101 20:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that something has to be done... but with the thing for keeping Merc units in one article, total re-write? --Dmon 20:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Meh - when I suggested Merc units should all fall under a single article (see Wolf's Dragoons?), others objected. ClanWolverine101 22:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, there was no consensus reached at BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Military_Commands#Policy_Needed. The discussion just fizzled, which means it's still being handled on an ad hoc basis. --Scaletail 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Touche'. ClanWolverine101 04:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, there was no consensus reached at BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Military_Commands#Policy_Needed. The discussion just fizzled, which means it's still being handled on an ad hoc basis. --Scaletail 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Meh - when I suggested Merc units should all fall under a single article (see Wolf's Dragoons?), others objected. ClanWolverine101 22:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Weather it is broken up or kept as one article is not of real importance.. the article is a mess and needs to be cleaned up. --Dmon 08:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I did some spelling and grammar corrections but I do not have access to source mats to do a full clean upDeeppockets 23:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)