Difference between revisions of "Talk:Invasion corridor - Clan Wolf"

(Request for Consensus on Conflict Formatting)
(→‎Request for Consensus: Text not tables)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Request for Consensus==
 
==Request for Consensus==
 
This article is the current poster-child for the edit-war tug of war between conflicting opinions of what Sarna should be doing with multi-world conflicts, mega lists all the info vs overviews leading to unit/planet articles, with even more variation besides. We really need to consider some consensus as it seems to be getting more and more bitter. Should we start a project for conflicts or piggy-back on the [[BattleTechWiki:Project Factions|Project: Factions]] which is meant to cover events? [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 18:55, 20 March 2014 (PDT)
 
This article is the current poster-child for the edit-war tug of war between conflicting opinions of what Sarna should be doing with multi-world conflicts, mega lists all the info vs overviews leading to unit/planet articles, with even more variation besides. We really need to consider some consensus as it seems to be getting more and more bitter. Should we start a project for conflicts or piggy-back on the [[BattleTechWiki:Project Factions|Project: Factions]] which is meant to cover events? [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 18:55, 20 March 2014 (PDT)
 +
:Me personaly I am in favour of a list of units involved and an over view of the action not huge tables full of day by day movements of units.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:41, 20 March 2014 (PDT)

Revision as of 22:41, 20 March 2014

Cleanup

I stard to move the the Commands and World section content to his proper articles.--Doneve 14:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Request for Consensus

This article is the current poster-child for the edit-war tug of war between conflicting opinions of what Sarna should be doing with multi-world conflicts, mega lists all the info vs overviews leading to unit/planet articles, with even more variation besides. We really need to consider some consensus as it seems to be getting more and more bitter. Should we start a project for conflicts or piggy-back on the Project: Factions which is meant to cover events? Cyc (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2014 (PDT)

Me personaly I am in favour of a list of units involved and an over view of the action not huge tables full of day by day movements of units.--Dmon (talk) 19:41, 20 March 2014 (PDT)