Difference between revisions of "Talk:Li Sak To"

(response - playing devil's advocate)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
:::If I may, speculation can be okay as long as its presented as speculation and has verifiable points. For example: Devlin Stone = Arthur Steiner-Davion. Not saying people shouldn't try Ask the Writers, but the writers don't always answer. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:25, 27 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:::If I may, speculation can be okay as long as its presented as speculation and has verifiable points. For example: Devlin Stone = Arthur Steiner-Davion. Not saying people shouldn't try Ask the Writers, but the writers don't always answer. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:25, 27 March 2013 (PDT)
 +
::::I understand what you're saying, but there's no reason for it to be disputed on the article. Let's discuss it here and replace the information when we have consensus. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] ([[User talk:Scaletail|talk]]) 16:43, 28 March 2013 (PDT)
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 19:43, 28 March 2013

Bio.gif This article is within the scope of the Project Characters, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Characters. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Bio.gif



This article is within the scope of the Unfinished Book WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki through the data-mining of official BattleTech publications. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Speculation

The following was included in the article and has been moved to this discussion page. If there is doubt about a typo, please go to the "Ask the Writers" section of the forum and ask. Speculation is not verifiable. --Scaletail (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2013 (PDT)


Sak To is probably Emerald of the Black Dragons. While sources names a Tai-sa 'Tok Do' as Emerald[1], the fact the Tok Do is a planetary name, the fact the rank is the same, the fact that the names are similar, and the fact that both Emerald[2] and the Second Sword of Light[3] are mentioned to have started the rebellion makes it likely that Tok Do is a printing error.

EDIT: Li Tok Do (Tai-shu of the Galedon Military District and "Emerald" in the Council of Gems)[4] and Li Sak To (Tai-sa in the 2nd Sword of Light)[5] are indeed two different people.


If I may, speculation can be okay as long as its presented as speculation and has verifiable points. For example: Devlin Stone = Arthur Steiner-Davion. Not saying people shouldn't try Ask the Writers, but the writers don't always answer. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2013 (PDT)
I understand what you're saying, but there's no reason for it to be disputed on the article. Let's discuss it here and replace the information when we have consensus. --Scaletail (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2013 (PDT)

References

  1. Jihad Secrets: The Blake Documents, p. 43
  2. Blake Ascending, p. 68
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named JTPL_6-7
  4. Field Manual: Updates, p. 117
  5. Field Manual: Updates, p. 119