Difference between revisions of "User talk:BobTheZombie/Sandbox"

m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Nice! And thanks for doing this. I've mentioned on other pages that I'd like to see the units (Avalon Hussars, Davion Brigade of Guards, etc.) listed on the main page. They have onlyinclude tags on them so it would just pull in the first paragraph of the brigade page. That's the only comment I have on this.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 03:31, 26 March 2014 (PDT)
 
Nice! And thanks for doing this. I've mentioned on other pages that I'd like to see the units (Avalon Hussars, Davion Brigade of Guards, etc.) listed on the main page. They have onlyinclude tags on them so it would just pull in the first paragraph of the brigade page. That's the only comment I have on this.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 03:31, 26 March 2014 (PDT)
::And actually, the same thing should appear under the Military Departments section. Just a brief list of the departments at a minimum. (They are critical to the AFFS, after all. ;) )--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 03:33, 26 March 2014 (PDT)
+
:And actually, the same thing should appear under the Military Departments section. Just a brief list of the departments at a minimum. (They are critical to the AFFS, after all. ;) )--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 03:33, 26 March 2014 (PDT)
 +
::I think the page could do with mentioning that the AFFS is the successor to the Federated Peacekeeping Force (FPF), the date it changed from the FPF to the AFFS, and a short summary of why/under whose orders. I do like the look and layout though - clean and minimalist without being too minimalist. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 04:14, 26 March 2014 (PDT)

Revision as of 07:14, 26 March 2014

Nice! And thanks for doing this. I've mentioned on other pages that I'd like to see the units (Avalon Hussars, Davion Brigade of Guards, etc.) listed on the main page. They have onlyinclude tags on them so it would just pull in the first paragraph of the brigade page. That's the only comment I have on this.--Mbear(talk) 03:31, 26 March 2014 (PDT)

And actually, the same thing should appear under the Military Departments section. Just a brief list of the departments at a minimum. (They are critical to the AFFS, after all. ;) )--Mbear(talk) 03:33, 26 March 2014 (PDT)
I think the page could do with mentioning that the AFFS is the successor to the Federated Peacekeeping Force (FPF), the date it changed from the FPF to the AFFS, and a short summary of why/under whose orders. I do like the look and layout though - clean and minimalist without being too minimalist. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 04:14, 26 March 2014 (PDT)