User talk:Ebakunin

• Talk Archive

Thanks for 2010

Hi Ebakunin! We miss you! Your edits to the CCG articles this year were tremendous, so I wanted to give you a Founders Award. We hope to see you back at some point! Nicjansma 05:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Ebakunin, nice to see you back after a couple of years, ähm i undo your revison on the 3068 year page, i think this helps Policy:Year Pages.--Doneve (talk) 01:54, 6 June 2015 (PDT)

Infoboxs

Good morning Ebakunin,

Just looking at your edits to the Brendon Corbett article and noticed you removed Siblings, spouse and children from the infobox. Why did you do this? I am aware that brendon is a Clanner, but since it is common place on the wiki for articles to be started by copy pasting another article and then editing to fit, they do not show up unless filled in, So I really can not figure out any reason to remove them.--Dmon (talk) 23:48, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

Restored. --Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:51, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

Thanks, Jumping on it before it could prolifirate. We already have at least two subvariants of the Character infobox floating about one missing spouse and another missing othernames.. The latter can be really annoying when doing BattleTech Video Game characters who all have callsigns!--Dmon (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

On a different note...

On a different note... Welcome back, I noticed a few days ago you where about, it has been about a decade since I have seen you around these parts!--Dmon (talk) 00:12, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

Tripitz edit

Hi Ebakunin, in your recent cleanup edit on the Tripitz page you removed the "{sic}" part from the bolded initial mentioning of the name. Why? I feel it is important to stress right out of the gate in the article that this "misspelling" is actual canon. In its current form, this information is hidden in a footnote which I feel could be confusing for readers. Frabby (talk) 03:03, 8 July 2019 (EDT)

Hi Frabby. I removed the {sic} because it's not a misspelling "in-universe" but rather an editor misspelling that became canon. However, I'm not terribly invested in the difference. The change has been been reverted. Thanks. --Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:52, 8 July 2019 (EDT)

Moratorium

Hey Ebakunin,

Just want to remind that your Marotta Kerensky article is still subject to Policy:Moratorium until 18 July. I am sure you are aware, so I am more doing this so I know I am doing my job --Dmon (talk) 19:46, 26 May 2020 (EDT)

Valencia

You wrote over what i was putting in on the Touring the Star: Valencia. Please becareful. Wrangler (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2020 (EDT)

What do you want do? Are you doing it or am I? I had it done. :( -- Wrangler (talk) 20:36, 21 August 2020 (EDT)

Here's the recent changes for the article:

  ! 17:33 	Touring the Stars: Valencia‎‎ (7 changes | history) . . (+3,975)‎ . . [Ebakunin‎ (2×); Wrangler‎ (5×)]
m ! 	17:33 (cur | prev) . . (-960)‎ . . Wrangler (talk | contribs | block) [rollback]
  ! 	17:33 (cur | prev) . . (+2,563)‎ . . Wrangler (talk | contribs | block) (its the 28th...)
m   	17:31 (cur | prev) . . (+858)‎ . . Ebakunin (talk | contribs | block)
  ! 	17:30 (cur | prev) . . (+42)‎ . . Wrangler (talk | contribs | block) (adding missing cover wIll TRY add content back that was erased)
  ! 	17:27 (cur | prev) . . (-2)‎ . . Wrangler (talk | contribs | block) (2 months, not 1 unless policey was changed)
  ! 	17:27 (cur | prev) . . (+159)‎ . . Wrangler (talk | contribs | block) (Adding some content since editing at same time ERASED what i did.)
m   	17:24 (cur | prev) . . (+1,315)‎ . . Ebakunin (talk | contribs | block)

We were literally editing it at the same time. --Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:39, 21 August 2020 (EDT)

Ack. Sorry man. I fixed the content. I don't own the other book. We need better way work out who doing what update. I've on most part done most of the updates on new products. Literally last thing i can do since everyone so fast to add stuff to the wiki. -- Wrangler (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2020 (EDT)

Don't worry. The conflicting edits happen. I was bit weebit upset. but it happens. There is a template that says "undercontruction". However, i've yet see anyone use it in years. I've haven't sever conflict-edits in literally years. Not since Doneve was still active editing. We ran over each other edits all the time. lol. Hopefully we can avoid this next time. --

Bloodname Clans

Hi,

Regarding the changes you made on Icaza (Bloodname), I've reverted some of them. We always add the clan where it comes from as there are too many mixed bloodnames, and this can help identify this. Also, warriors are ordered by rank, and inside rank, by first name. Thanks!--Pserratv (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2020 (EDT)

In the case of Icaza, I removed the clan source as the intro specifically says the Bloodname is exclusive to Jade Falcon, i.e. they are no mixed Bloodnames in this House. Otherwise, you're right, I should have placed Magnus in the correct order. --Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:35, 5 September 2020 (EDT)

OmniMech names in listings

Hi,

I noted in your recent edits that you're changing the links for OmniMechs to only one of their dual name. May I ask why? I had deliberately used their dual-name article naming scheme in the lists, e.g. Hellbringer (Loki), because both names are equally "official" and relevant in the context. Also, I cannot see a pattern as to when you're using the Clan name and when you're using the IS reporting name? Frabby (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2020 (EDT)

Disambiguating ship names

Hi,

I noticed, while re-arranging your ship list in Icons of War to the established format, that you've used disambiguation names, e.g. "Boarhound (Individual DropShip)". While not per se wrong, it seems superfluous to identify the Boarhound as a DropShip when it is the only known vessel in all of BattleTech to bear that name. Conversely, in cases where disambiguation is required, the exact ship class (if known) is also added, e.g. "Botany Bay (Individual Gazelle-class DropShips)". Frabby (talk) 10:01, 14 October 2020 (EDT)