Difference between revisions of "User talk:Networ Issue"
m |
(Binary Laser again) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Binary and Bombat Lasers == | == Binary and Bombat Lasers == | ||
Hi, I'm just dropping you a quick note about your amendments to the [[Binary Laser Cannon]] and the [[Bombast Laser]] articles. You'd amended the heat/damage ratings on the Binary Laser Cannon and the introduction date on the Bombast Laser, but you hadn't included references to back up the amended dates you'd entered. I checked the detail against the latest edition of Tactical Operations, which incorporated Errata List 1.4 (the last listed reference in the articles) and the original details were correct. If you're aware of a later publication that changes those details, can you cite it as a reference to avoid confusion, please? Many thanks. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 02:47, 26 August 2014 (PDT) | Hi, I'm just dropping you a quick note about your amendments to the [[Binary Laser Cannon]] and the [[Bombast Laser]] articles. You'd amended the heat/damage ratings on the Binary Laser Cannon and the introduction date on the Bombast Laser, but you hadn't included references to back up the amended dates you'd entered. I checked the detail against the latest edition of Tactical Operations, which incorporated Errata List 1.4 (the last listed reference in the articles) and the original details were correct. If you're aware of a later publication that changes those details, can you cite it as a reference to avoid confusion, please? Many thanks. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 02:47, 26 August 2014 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Vandalism-1}} | ||
+ | :Binary Laser again. I've just reverted your recent edits, because, bluntly said, they seemed nonsensical. I checked, and none of these changes had anything to do with the cited Errara (or any official errata document for TacOps), and I have no idea where you got the notion from that the errata could be "possibly outdated". I'm probably missing something here, so I ask you to explain why, and based on what canonical information, you made these changes? | ||
+ | :Also, what is the source of the Binary Laser image you uploaded please? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:28, 31 August 2014 (PDT) |
Revision as of 07:28, 31 August 2014
Welcome
Binary and Bombat Lasers
Hi, I'm just dropping you a quick note about your amendments to the Binary Laser Cannon and the Bombast Laser articles. You'd amended the heat/damage ratings on the Binary Laser Cannon and the introduction date on the Bombast Laser, but you hadn't included references to back up the amended dates you'd entered. I checked the detail against the latest edition of Tactical Operations, which incorporated Errata List 1.4 (the last listed reference in the articles) and the original details were correct. If you're aware of a later publication that changes those details, can you cite it as a reference to avoid confusion, please? Many thanks. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 02:47, 26 August 2014 (PDT)
Your Test Worked and Has Been Removed Welcome to BattleTechWiki. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or nonconstructive and have been reverted or removed, as they could be considered to be vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make and take a look at the Getting Started page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. |
- Binary Laser again. I've just reverted your recent edits, because, bluntly said, they seemed nonsensical. I checked, and none of these changes had anything to do with the cited Errara (or any official errata document for TacOps), and I have no idea where you got the notion from that the errata could be "possibly outdated". I'm probably missing something here, so I ask you to explain why, and based on what canonical information, you made these changes?
- Also, what is the source of the Binary Laser image you uploaded please? Frabby (talk) 04:28, 31 August 2014 (PDT)