Difference between revisions of "Category talk:100 ton BattleMechs"
Sarna News
(response) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Why is the Huntress Artillery mech not posted? The pictures and stats were printed in issue #14 of battle Technology? I have the article I just need to know how to upload it.--{{Unsigned|Vicktor Blueridge}} | Why is the Huntress Artillery mech not posted? The pictures and stats were printed in issue #14 of battle Technology? I have the article I just need to know how to upload it.--{{Unsigned|Vicktor Blueridge}} | ||
| + | : For one thing, its not considered canon at this point in time? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 23:01, 12 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:01, 13 March 2014
96 ton
- I see your note about it not being a typo. What I can't figure out is why it doesn't show on the cat page as that. --Revanche (admin) 15:32, 23 November 2006 (CST)
- Because it always categorises the page with it's actual page name. The pipe in the category link merely tells it in what order to place it. I done it so that 100 comes after 95, instead of before 80. You'll notice I did something similar with BattleTechWiki:BTWProject as well. --Xoid 16:21, 23 November 2006 (CST)
HNT-1S Huntress Battlemech
Why is the Huntress Artillery mech not posted? The pictures and stats were printed in issue #14 of battle Technology? I have the article I just need to know how to upload it.--— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by Vicktor Blueridge (talk • contribs) .
- For one thing, its not considered canon at this point in time? ClanWolverine101 (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2014 (PDT)