Difference between revisions of "Category talk:WarShips"
Sarna News
(question) |
(Comment: Disagree with specifying Lyran "state" used and operated what.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Of all the WarShip tags for [[Great Houses]], only "Lyran WarShips" does not have the complete name of the realm. This distinction is intentional: it allows us to group WarShips used by both the [[Lyran Commonwealth]] and [[Lyran Alliance]]. Does anyone disagree?--[[User:S.gage|S.gage]] | Of all the WarShip tags for [[Great Houses]], only "Lyran WarShips" does not have the complete name of the realm. This distinction is intentional: it allows us to group WarShips used by both the [[Lyran Commonwealth]] and [[Lyran Alliance]]. Does anyone disagree?--[[User:S.gage|S.gage]] | ||
| + | ::I disagree. The Lyran state is changing its name alot. It will be the devil adding more and more categorying listing particular ships to use of the Commonwealth, Alliance and then Commonwealth again, god knows what else in the future. Just keep it Lyran WarShips to keep it simplified. There not going be alot more WarShips any how so why make over detailed? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 13:12, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:12, 17 October 2009
Of all the WarShip tags for Great Houses, only "Lyran WarShips" does not have the complete name of the realm. This distinction is intentional: it allows us to group WarShips used by both the Lyran Commonwealth and Lyran Alliance. Does anyone disagree?--S.gage
- I disagree. The Lyran state is changing its name alot. It will be the devil adding more and more categorying listing particular ships to use of the Commonwealth, Alliance and then Commonwealth again, god knows what else in the future. Just keep it Lyran WarShips to keep it simplified. There not going be alot more WarShips any how so why make over detailed? -- Wrangler 13:12, 17 October 2009 (UTC)