Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crossbow SRM"

(So I take it there is user consensus that they should be deleted speedily?)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
:::::Oookay - so that means we don't actually have enough information about specific MechAssault weapon systems to reasonably assume they aren't standard weapon systems, and these articles (and links to them) should be undone, right? If yes, we need to move quickly while we can still see the edits on the Recent Changes page. With categories currently not updating, this is a bit of a pain to keep track of.
 
:::::Oookay - so that means we don't actually have enough information about specific MechAssault weapon systems to reasonably assume they aren't standard weapon systems, and these articles (and links to them) should be undone, right? If yes, we need to move quickly while we can still see the edits on the Recent Changes page. With categories currently not updating, this is a bit of a pain to keep track of.
 
:::::Can I presume we have user consensus that they should be deleted speedily? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 17:13, 25 March 2018 (EDT)
 
:::::Can I presume we have user consensus that they should be deleted speedily? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 17:13, 25 March 2018 (EDT)
 +
::::::I feel we need something, partly for reasons I explained in another thread, but if not I shall abandon the project and go back to my other ones.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 17:33, 25 March 2018 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:33, 25 March 2018

I think Crossbow might actually just be a model of SRM launcher, I don't think there's actually anything special about it. Could be the same case with Javelin LRM launchers. ~Amaroq Starwind~ (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2018 (EDT)

You are pretty much bang on, As far as I am aware there is no real functional difference. But given that the MechAssault games consistently treat it as a named weapon system rather than a brand, but at the same time we don't actually have much in the way of official stats so it could be anything. Dmon (talk) 14:28, 25 March 2018 (EDT)
On that note, it is kind of weird that in the first MechAssault, energy weapons require ammunition, and yet mechs can fire their missiles almost indefinitely. At least they got Heat Management right... ~Amaroq Starwind~ (talk) 16:04, 25 March 2018 (EDT)
I had not noticed that aspect!--Dmon (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2018 (EDT)
Oookay - so that means we don't actually have enough information about specific MechAssault weapon systems to reasonably assume they aren't standard weapon systems, and these articles (and links to them) should be undone, right? If yes, we need to move quickly while we can still see the edits on the Recent Changes page. With categories currently not updating, this is a bit of a pain to keep track of.
Can I presume we have user consensus that they should be deleted speedily? Frabby (talk) 17:13, 25 March 2018 (EDT)
I feel we need something, partly for reasons I explained in another thread, but if not I shall abandon the project and go back to my other ones.--Dmon (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2018 (EDT)