Difference between revisions of "Talk:Demolisher II"
m |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==Merge with Demolisher article?== | ==Merge with Demolisher article?== | ||
I noticed that the variants (II and III) of the Demolisher are already covered in the original article for the Demolisher. Guess it depends on wether you regard this as a variant or a proper new design. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 18:19, 7 June 2008 (CDT) | I noticed that the variants (II and III) of the Demolisher are already covered in the original article for the Demolisher. Guess it depends on wether you regard this as a variant or a proper new design. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 18:19, 7 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
+ | :Actually, it is not covered in [[Demolisher]]. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 17:53, 8 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::Oops. The ''Demolisher II'' is apparently a different vehicle from the ''Demolisher mkII'' that was mentioned as a variant. My fault. I wish TPTB would improve their designations to be more... well, sensible, intuitive, you get the idea. :/ [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 06:48, 9 June 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 19:51, 27 October 2023
Merge with Demolisher article?[edit]
I noticed that the variants (II and III) of the Demolisher are already covered in the original article for the Demolisher. Guess it depends on wether you regard this as a variant or a proper new design. Frabby 18:19, 7 June 2008 (CDT)
- Actually, it is not covered in Demolisher. --Scaletail 17:53, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
- Oops. The Demolisher II is apparently a different vehicle from the Demolisher mkII that was mentioned as a variant. My fault. I wish TPTB would improve their designations to be more... well, sensible, intuitive, you get the idea. :/ Frabby 06:48, 9 June 2008 (CDT)