Sarna News: Bad 'Mechs - Icestorm

Talk:Li Sak To

Revision as of 20:10, 28 March 2013 by Doneve (talk | contribs) (→‎Speculation: added a tag pipe to Emerald, the link bring me to the Emerald vessel page, and not to the person or so)
Bio.gif This article is within the scope of the Project Characters, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Characters. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Bio.gif



This article is within the scope of the Unfinished Book WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki through the data-mining of official BattleTech publications. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Speculation

The following was included in the article and has been moved to this discussion page. If there is doubt about a typo, please go to the "Ask the Writers" section of the forum and ask. Speculation is not verifiable. --Scaletail (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2013 (PDT)


Sak To is probably Emerald of the Black Dragons. While sources names a Tai-sa 'Tok Do' as Emerald[1], the fact the Tok Do is a planetary name, the fact the rank is the same, the fact that the names are similar, and the fact that both Emerald[2] and the Second Sword of Light[3] are mentioned to have started the rebellion makes it likely that Tok Do is a printing error.

EDIT: Li Tok Do (Tai-shu of the Galedon Military District and "Emerald" in the Council of Gems)[4] and Li Sak To (Tai-sa in the 2nd Sword of Light)[5] are indeed two different people.


If I may, speculation can be okay as long as its presented as speculation and has verifiable points. For example: Devlin Stone = Arthur Steiner-Davion. Not saying people shouldn't try Ask the Writers, but the writers don't always answer. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2013 (PDT)
I understand what you're saying, but there's no reason for it to be disputed on the article. Let's discuss it here and replace the information when we have consensus. --Scaletail (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2013 (PDT)

References

  1. Jihad Secrets: The Blake Documents, p. 43
  2. Blake Ascending, p. 68
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named JTPL_6-7
  4. Field Manual: Updates, p. 117
  5. Field Manual: Updates, p. 119