Difference between revisions of "Talk:Awesome"
Sarna News
(Pretty Baby isn't canon design, not offically anyways. Should not be in the article.) |
m |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Awesome "Pretty Baby"== | ==Awesome "Pretty Baby"== | ||
Anyone know where Pretty Baby came from? Supposedly it's canon, but it was only added to Sarna in response to PGI announcing its inclusion in MWO. -[[User:SilverlightPony|SilverlightPony]] ([[User talk:SilverlightPony|talk]]) 17:26, 10 February 2013 (PST) | Anyone know where Pretty Baby came from? Supposedly it's canon, but it was only added to Sarna in response to PGI announcing its inclusion in MWO. -[[User:SilverlightPony|SilverlightPony]] ([[User talk:SilverlightPony|talk]]) 17:26, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
::Looks like someone decided to add it to the custom variants. MWO is not canon source so i'm pulling it out of the article. Unless a Record Sheet or offical source is published by Catayst Game Labs, it can't be in the article. - [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 17:48, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ::Looks like someone decided to add it to the custom variants. MWO is not canon source so i'm pulling it out of the article. Unless a Record Sheet or offical source is published by Catayst Game Labs, it can't be in the article. - [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 17:48, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
| + | :::To be fair, certain apocryphal sources are acceptable, if not directly contradicted. I am *NOT* saying MWO is one of those, mind you. See the [[canon]] article for details. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 20:05, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
| + | ::::I've heard one of the 3025 TROs had them, but I don't have them in front of me now.--[[User:Seth|Seth]] ([[User talk:Seth|talk]]) 23:01, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
| + | :::::The pilot is directly from the original Technical Readout: 3025. However, the notable pilot entry does not mention about stats for the 'Mech only about the pilot. That part is all canon. Problem is we notearity, it was ruled way back that entries in TROs aren't enough to be listed as notable pilot in Sarna Mech articles. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 15:18, 28 February 2013 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ALL apocryphal sources are acceptable (see [[Policy:Notability]]), with the caveat that apocryphal material must be tagged accordingly (see [[Policy:Canon]]). If and when the ''Pretty Baby'' appears as a MWO Hero Mech it deserves a notion. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 23:36, 10 February 2013 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:25, 18 September 2023
Awesome "Pretty Baby"[edit]
Anyone know where Pretty Baby came from? Supposedly it's canon, but it was only added to Sarna in response to PGI announcing its inclusion in MWO. -SilverlightPony (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- Looks like someone decided to add it to the custom variants. MWO is not canon source so i'm pulling it out of the article. Unless a Record Sheet or offical source is published by Catayst Game Labs, it can't be in the article. - Wrangler (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- To be fair, certain apocryphal sources are acceptable, if not directly contradicted. I am *NOT* saying MWO is one of those, mind you. See the canon article for details. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- I've heard one of the 3025 TROs had them, but I don't have them in front of me now.--Seth (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- The pilot is directly from the original Technical Readout: 3025. However, the notable pilot entry does not mention about stats for the 'Mech only about the pilot. That part is all canon. Problem is we notearity, it was ruled way back that entries in TROs aren't enough to be listed as notable pilot in Sarna Mech articles. -- Wrangler (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2013 (PST)
- I've heard one of the 3025 TROs had them, but I don't have them in front of me now.--Seth (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- To be fair, certain apocryphal sources are acceptable, if not directly contradicted. I am *NOT* saying MWO is one of those, mind you. See the canon article for details. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2013 (PST)
- Looks like someone decided to add it to the custom variants. MWO is not canon source so i'm pulling it out of the article. Unless a Record Sheet or offical source is published by Catayst Game Labs, it can't be in the article. - Wrangler (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2013 (PST)
ALL apocryphal sources are acceptable (see Policy:Notability), with the caveat that apocryphal material must be tagged accordingly (see Policy:Canon). If and when the Pretty Baby appears as a MWO Hero Mech it deserves a notion. Frabby (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2013 (PST)