Difference between revisions of "User talk:Revanche"

Line 84: Line 84:
  
 
: Hey, Dude RB. If you feel you have consensus to move forward and are ready to experiment with editing a template, please take your shot. Reach out to me either here or on the server if you experience any difficulty. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 06:37, 25 October 2021 (EDT)
 
: Hey, Dude RB. If you feel you have consensus to move forward and are ready to experiment with editing a template, please take your shot. Reach out to me either here or on the server if you experience any difficulty. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 06:37, 25 October 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
==3032 year page==
 +
Why did you remove the entry for the opening of the Outreach Hiring Hall in March of 3032? It was challenged, but the source was found and I just put it into the pertinent articles. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 06:45, 5 November 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:45, 5 November 2021

Archives

Current

Please add new entries to the bottom of this page (in order to ensure I actually see them).

Store links

Hi Rev, good to see you back in action! Have a virtual pat on the back buddy! :)

A word of caution though: You've been inserting store links into item articles (specifically, BattleRun 2). I think this is a bad idea. Using links to external sites has bitten Sarna in the back multiple times in the past already, because those links go obsolete in a heartbeat when the other site decides to change their makeup, or simply goes offline. We've seen a forum crash, two changes of link structure on the new forum, the death of BattleCorps and some other sites, and one or two revampings of the Catalyst store so far. In each and every case we suddenly had dead links on Sarna. To this day we're seeing occasional IP edits fixing or simply removing old store links from many years ago that are now dead links. My takeaway is to avoid external links like the plague, and straight out copy relevant online content (like official rulings) to talk pages to archive them there. Frabby (talk) 05:40, 4 May 2021 (EDT)

Thanks for the welcome, Frabby. Sure, I can recognize that danger, especially if it has already happened. The reasons for adding them are understood, but it appears the administrative cost is too high (don't get me started on how it is still difficult for new players to even find the store on the CGL site; I do my purchasing on DriveThru). As to adding store links, why don't we just remove them altogether? A large part of wikis involves copying wikicode and changing it. If we do away with it, then it won't be replicated by editors (and errant admin-types).--Revanche (talk|contribs) 08:02, 4 May 2021 (EDT)

Ping!

Hey buddy. Made it to the Discord channel.--Mbear(talk) 12:00, 14 June 2021 (EDT)

Ping received--Revanche (talk|contribs) 15:09, 14 June 2021 (EDT).
testing, 1, 2, 3...-Volt (talk) 10:33, 20 June 2021 (EDT)

Category Notable Pilots

Hi Revanche,

I copied the "base" of Category:Notable Awesome pilots from another "Notable Page", so most probably issues are in all those pages. will you review and correct them?--Pserratv (talk) 06:48, 21 June 2021 (EDT)

Rgr, wilco.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 07:34, 21 June 2021 (EDT)
Thanks!--Pserratv (talk) 08:13, 21 June 2021 (EDT)

Tamar Rising systems

Hi Rev, in regards to this File:Tamar Rising coordinates 2021-06-16 (CGL).png, I think it should be noted somewhere in the text box going with the file that two of the three systems have subsequently been identified as pre-existing systems by Ray that had been renamed. Just to make it clear that we aren't looking at three entirely new and previously unmapped systems (only one). Frabby (talk) 03:48, 22 June 2021 (EDT)

For your review.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 06:12, 22 June 2021 (EDT)

DPL (Help, Policy, etc.)

Here you go! User:Mbear/RevancheDPLTest--Mbear(talk) 08:42, 24 June 2021 (EDT)

Laundry List

Put up a few thoughts in the Admins section of the Sarna forum. Frabby (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2021 (EDT)

Will be there shortly. Just wanting to wrap-up this current distraction.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 20:14, 27 June 2021 (EDT)

Out of date infobox

Hey Rev, just noticed you updating the Template:InfoBoxStateUnit, and I am guessing that you do not know that it has been retired alongside Template:InfoBoxMercUnit because they are not time agnostic.

I created Template:InfoBoxMilitaryCommand a time agnostic and generally more flexible box about 2 years ago.--Dmon (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2021 (EDT)

Did. Not. Know. Thanks for the early head's up! Hey, do you think replacing those two via Nic's bot is something you'd like to consider? Also, strongly suggest a banner be created/added to those, so that others (including forgetful me) don't trend back to their use.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 20:15, 27 June 2021 (EDT)
If we can get a bot to do it... The answer is Yes x 10,000 because I have the unfortunate task of informing somebody they are using the wrong infobox at least once a week between this and the updated character box I did last year.--Dmon (talk) 20:19, 27 June 2021 (EDT)
It's certainly a possibility. Here's how to "apply".--Revanche (talk|contribs) 20:22, 27 June 2021 (EDT)
Created a banner aand will ask Nic--Dmon (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2021 (EDT)
That might catch my attention next time. ;) --Revanche (talk|contribs) 21:07, 27 June 2021 (EDT)

Category Correction: Individual Naval Vessel

So tried my hand at creating a template (Template:InfoBoxIndividualNavalVessel)and I think I correctly built it. However, I made an error on creating the category (Category:Individual Naval Vessels) to capture the articles that use the template by putting an 's' at the end of Vessel. Are you able to correct that? Thanks!CungrVanck (talk) 07:07, 30 June 2021 (EDT)

Can you get on Discord?--Revanche (talk|contribs) 07:42, 30 June 2021 (EDT)

InfoBoxProduct

Revanche, I am following up on the matter of adding the field Format to the Product Infobox, namely, Template:InfoBoxProduct and Template:InfoBoxProduct/doc. Probing the documents, I have a rough sense of what edits would be needed. But I also surmise that these pages are sensitive and that an error in set up would immediately affect anything using that template (though I suppose any error in editing could be fixed by reversion). So do these go through the ususal edit process? or do they require some special handling? --Dude RB (talk) 22:03, 24 October 2021 (EDT)

Hey, Dude RB. If you feel you have consensus to move forward and are ready to experiment with editing a template, please take your shot. Reach out to me either here or on the server if you experience any difficulty. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 06:37, 25 October 2021 (EDT)

3032 year page

Why did you remove the entry for the opening of the Outreach Hiring Hall in March of 3032? It was challenged, but the source was found and I just put it into the pertinent articles. Frabby (talk) 06:45, 5 November 2021 (EDT)