Difference between revisions of "Talk:Extended Range Medium Laser"
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
::This table has the Magna Mk whatever span ID around it, so maybe that will work. This way we get the advantage of the table layout and still provide fluff details.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 10:38, 27 September 2019 (EDT) | ::This table has the Magna Mk whatever span ID around it, so maybe that will work. This way we get the advantage of the table layout and still provide fluff details.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 10:38, 27 September 2019 (EDT) | ||
+ | :::I am specifically trying not to put such info into tables as the weapons articles are already very number and rules heavy compared to the rest of the wiki. I want to try and encourage fluff to be written as you can buy a copy of the rules pretty easily if you want hard numbers. |
Revision as of 11:14, 27 September 2019
This article is within the scope of the Project Technology, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Technology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
This article has been flagged for review by the Technology WikiProject team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.
Why are we breaking out individual models of lasers from the table?
Just curious to know why we're breaking up a large table into several smaller ones. Is it to take advantage of redirection or something?--Mbear(talk) 10:07, 27 September 2019 (EDT)
- That and to begin to include fluff details like lens sizes, beam colors and unreliability of specific models of weapon. The process is a slow one but the Medium Laser is currently further along as to what I want to include.--Dmon (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2019 (EDT)
- OK. That all seems like stuff we could put in another table column headed "Notes"; Something like this:
Brand | Planet | Company | Used by | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magna Mk VI | Lopez | Magna | [citation needed] | 3 cm beam; blue | |
Magna Mk VI | Stewart | Corean Enterprises | [citation needed] | ||
BrightBloom | New Avalon Wernke |
Achernar BattleMechs Kallon Industries |
??? | [citation needed] | invisible to naked eye |
Ceres Arms | Capella/St. Ives | Ceres Metals Industries | ??? | [citation needed] | |
ExoStar Pinnacle (Clantech) | Unknown | ExoStar Laser Technologies | UCU-F4 Scarecrow | [1] | |
Martell | El Dorado | General Motors | BLR-2D Warlord | [2] | |
SCI | [3] | ||||
Series 7J | Tamaron | Ashton 'Mech Production Complex | ??? | [citation needed] | |
Series J7A | Arcadia | Arcadia BattleMech Plant CM-T4 | ??? | [citation needed] | |
General Systems | Huntress | Abysmal Manufacturing Complex | ??? | [citation needed] |
- This table has the Magna Mk whatever span ID around it, so maybe that will work. This way we get the advantage of the table layout and still provide fluff details.--Mbear(talk) 10:38, 27 September 2019 (EDT)
- I am specifically trying not to put such info into tables as the weapons articles are already very number and rules heavy compared to the rest of the wiki. I want to try and encourage fluff to be written as you can buy a copy of the rules pretty easily if you want hard numbers.
- I am specifically trying not to put such info into tables as the weapons articles are already very number and rules heavy compared to the rest of the wiki. I want to try and encourage fluff to be written as you can buy a copy of the rules pretty easily if you want hard numbers.
- This table has the Magna Mk whatever span ID around it, so maybe that will work. This way we get the advantage of the table layout and still provide fluff details.--Mbear(talk) 10:38, 27 September 2019 (EDT)