Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mbear"

(Unit Update)
 
(67 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
*[[User_talk:Mbear/archive2012]]
 
*[[User_talk:Mbear/archive2012]]
 
*[[User_talk:Mbear/archive2013]]
 
*[[User_talk:Mbear/archive2013]]
 +
*[[User_talk:Mbear/archive2014]]
 +
*[[User_talk:Mbear/archive2015]]
  
  
==Deletion==
+
==LX Corps==
Hi Mbear, happy new year, please can you delete the [[2nd Guards]] page, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:00, 2 January 2014 (PST)
+
Hi, i removed the image it is wrong, i uploade the correct.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:42, 26 January 2016 (PST)
:Done! --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 13:23, 2 January 2014 (PST)
 
  
== Character Naming ==
+
==Davion Assault Guards==
Hello Mbear, question for you about the naming standard on Sarna for pages of characters with the same name.  Taking for example [[Thaddeus Marik]] which will bring you to the disambiguation for three different Thaddeus'.  I than go to [[Christopher Marik]] which brings you to two different pages, either [[Christopher Marik (24th c.)]] or [[Christopher Marik (32nd c.)]].  Question is, I need to create a page for Kenyon Marik of the Dark Age instead of [[Kenyon Marik]] the Captain-General.  So which naming method should be used to differentiate these two characters?  [[User:DerangedShadow|DerangedShadow]] ([[User talk:DerangedShadow|talk]]) 17:37, 13 January 2014 (PST)
+
Hey Mbear, noticed somebody edited your [[User:Mbear/Davion Assault Guards|Davion Assault Guards]] page, I am going to assume that the user thought it was the "main article" as it where. Since you have not touched the article since 2013 do you think we could possibly retire it to avoid confusion? Cheers --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 13:01, 4 February 2016 (PST)
:I'm not as familiar with the naming conventions for characters as I should be. That said I think your question might be better posted on the [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Biographies|Biography Project Talk page]]. If you can't get an answer there, we're all in trouble! ;) --[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:55, 14 January 2014 (PST)
 
::Thank you Mbear for the direction.  I never would have thought about posting there.  :)  [[User:DerangedShadow|DerangedShadow]] ([[User talk:DerangedShadow|talk]]) 05:31, 14 January 2014 (PST)
 
:::I've responded over on the Biography Project Talk page with a link to the character article naming convention that explains what to do {{Emoticon| :) }} [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 09:31, 14 January 2014 (PST)
 
== Simian Battle Armor article ==
 
Hi, Mbear. I'm contacting you regarding the [[Simian|Simian Battle Armor]] article you wrote. I finished up the [[Centaur Battle Armor]] article, their TRO:3145 ROTS fluff is related to one another. The fluff you have in there is based on the INN information mainly, do you want me to update this article or do you want to? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 13:18, 24 January 2014 (PST)
 
:Feel free to make the changes. (Sorry about the delay getting back to you, I was busy this weekend.)--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:41, 27 January 2014 (PST)
 
::No worries, It will be next item i'll take care of. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 11:36, 29 January 2014 (PST)
 
  
== Rampant evolution or rampant destruction? ==
+
== Jade Falcon units ==
Hey Mbear, I am beginning to become extremely concerned about Neuling again. I have just noticed that the [[DCMS]] page has pretty much been totally dismantled and has been like that for over a week. I am honestly not sure if it is evolution or outright destruction a lot of the work. Is there a way we can possibly reduce the damage from what he is doing?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 20:44, 11 March 2014 (PDT)
 
  
==New Idea==
+
Mbear - yeah, i get the issue. The units in question fought the Kell Hounds, resulting in the death of Daniel Allard. Unfortunately, they weren't mentioned by name. Nevertheless, other sources clear state their presence. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 17:40, 2 June 2016 (PDT)
''copy from BrokenMnemonic's talk page''
 
  
Hy BM. A new idea by myself, i want to create a template like the Rules section [div class="gamerules"] but in red on some pages for the notes section to highlight some errata or inconsistence thinks there descriped in the notes section and so on, and highlighte some answered questions from the BT forum, is this a good idea, i want to involve Mbear to this, any thoughts.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 17:29, 23 March 2014 (PDT)
+
== Victroy Ranger units==
:Hy Doneve,
+
Hi, i see you removed the update needed tags, i dont want to add tags for [[Field Manual: 3145]] the pages need to update by this source, can you do this when you found time, cheers.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 07:11, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
:Would you want the box to highlight canon inconsistencies where we've got two canon sources that contradict each other, or to highlight comments and rulings from TPTB, or both? I think it's a good idea, but red is associated with warnings - it's only really used on here for warning people who're breaking rules and for marking out fanon entries - so I'd be tempted to make it a different color. I don't know much about the div class templates like the gamerules one, and I've never tried making one - my first thought is, would it be something that we could do using tags like those Frabby made up to mark Apocryphal detail within an article? I know that I like to include answers and comments from TPTB in the article itself in the notes page, whereas Frabby prefers to put the detail in the talk page, so there might be a difference of opinion over whether the template is needed or not. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 00:45, 24 March 2014 (PDT)
 
::Adding a class or section like that is possible, but we need to talk to NicJ to make that happen. BrokenMnemonic is right, red we usually use for CRITICAL or ERROR conditions so we don't want to use that. I'd look at Frabby's Apocryphal stuff as a model for this.
 
::I'm not clear on what you're trying to achieve with this project though. Can you provide an example? Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:38, 24 March 2014 (PDT)
 
:::Ok, at first i want to highlight the answered questions from the BT forum BM has added to so many diffrent articles in the note section, as example look here [[Colonial Tractors]], you and BM are right the color red is not ok, what options have we? I think this is enough at this time.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 08:00, 24 March 2014 (PDT)
 
:::Doesn't the quote set it off enough?--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 08:04, 24 March 2014 (PDT)
 
::::You're right i stop this idea, thanks for involving, i poke around what we can much better on the wiki, but i stop and work my way what i do at this time, update composition histories and owner histories.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 16:06, 24 March 2014 (PDT)
 
  
+
== SLDF Units ==
==Under Construction category?==
 
Is there a way to list all pages with the underconstruction tag on them?
 
:Does this help? --> http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Underconstruction  -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 12:53, 10 April 2014 (PDT)
 
::Yes it does. Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:36, 14 April 2014 (PDT)
 
  
==User 1st Legion==
+
Hi, started to add some updates to the SLDF units, but I see it is one of your pet projects. I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but if you need any help just let me know. [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 08:17, 13 June 2016 (PDT)
Hy Mbear, don't know what we do with user 1st Legion, he make childish vandalism, blanked pages and add some fanon to sarna, we talked to him but no response or the talk was deleted, i feel a one week block is ok, i wait for your response, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 06:44, 25 April 2014 (PDT)
 
  
==BurnrateInfo==
+
==St. Ives Sentinels==
Why did you have to do this to me undo do it>:(.{{Unsigned|1st Legion}}
+
Hello. The Armored Infantry and Mounted Fusiliers are the 1st and 2nd St. Ives Sentinels. You listed them as dead and created new pages for the 1st and 2nd. What do you want me to do about them? [[User:Henryjones000|Henryjones000]] ([[User talk:Henryjones000|talk]]) 12:44, 13 April 2017 (EDT)
:Huh? What are you talking about?--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 12:39, 28 April 2014 (PDT)
 
==Status request==
 
Hello Mbear, I ask what is the staus of my latest work about the various nit pages. Have the community chose what is usefull and what not. Because when the majority doesn't accept it that is a sign for me to not waste more of my time at this topic. With best regards [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 11:48, 15 May 2014 (PDT)
 
:I haven't heard anything. I know NicJ likes the look, and I think it would be valuable too if it was broken out by Era rather than year. You may want to ask on the Military Commands page in [[Project_Military_Commands#Active_Units|Active Units]].--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 10:22, 16 May 2014 (PDT)
 
  
==Wars of the Republic Era==
+
== Spammers ==
Are you going work on the units in the book? I mean the Mech and DropShip? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 11:39, 15 September 2014 (PDT)
 
:I have no idea. I don't think I will. I was just fixing the italics on the page. ClanWolverine101 has tagged a bunch of articles with Update Needed tags, so apparently I'm supposed to work on those first.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:41, 15 September 2014 (PDT)
 
::I've not had a lot time to work on articles. I'm available for the next couple days however.  Only thing is i'm not sure when that book is out of Mort. Since it was uncertain when the printed version was published. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]])
 
:::As far as I know this source ISN'T out of moratorium, so don't do anything with that source.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:45, 15 September 2014 (PDT)
 
  
==List Table==
+
I saw your efforts to delete all the spambots earlier, just wanted to say thanks for all your hard work as an admin. It's really appreciated, you deserve this award. [[File:VC 2bol.jpg|Vandal Cop Award, 3rd ribbon]] [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 17:00, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
I was thinking of adding a table to the bottom of each of the video game equipment pages that would contain each of the weapons and be able to organize by most-least damage, heaviest-lightest, etc. How would this be set up and how hard would it be to copy the data from the old tables to the new one? -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 15:22, 28 September 2014 (PDT)
 
:It looks like you can just add the class='''sortable''' to our tables and they'll be sortable. See [[User:Mbear/TableTest]] for an example I copied from [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sorting#Sorting_rows_of_a_table https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sorting#Sorting_rows_of_a_table]. If table sorting works there, it should work on your tables too.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:30, 29 September 2014 (PDT)
 
::Cool! I just could not think of what that was called. Thanks! -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 10:09, 29 September 2014 (PDT)
 
:::I got it to work using the table found on the [[DropShip]] page, and the data copied over nicely. -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 14:07, 29 September 2014 (PDT)
 
::::Nice!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:25, 30 September 2014 (PDT)
 
  
== Updates Needed ==
+
:In the same vein, thank you for standing in the trenches and fighting off the soulless spambots with me and BrokenMnemonic. Have another Vandal Cop award on me. (4th ribbon, right?) [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 03:21, 13 July 2017 (EDT)
Hi Mbear,<br>
 
Over the next few days I'll try and get the updates done towards the end of the list - there are a bunch of SLDF Corps and ROTS units in the X's that need updates from Field Manuals, which I can peck away at while I'm at work. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:55, 7 October 2014 (PDT)
 
:Sounds good!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:55, 8 October 2014 (PDT)
 
::I'm still going through and knocking off articles as best I can (I was away over the weekend for a friend's wedding anniversary) but - and don't tell anyone else, in case someone goes on a tagging spree - we're close to breaking through to eleven hundred articles with updates needed. Which on the one hand is terrible, but on the other means we'll have knocked more than a twelfth of the update needed tags out in a couple of weeks. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:56, 14 October 2014 (PDT)
 
:::Don't look now, but you're about to break through 1,050 updates needed. That'll be an eighth of the way through. I'm sorry I'm not getting more done to help - work's not only crazy, they moved where I sit, and it's a damn sight harder to check books and edit sneakily during the day, which cuts down on my editing time. I'll keep plugging away, though. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:54, 22 October 2014 (PDT)
 
::::As of this day, the 10th of November 2014, the updates needed category dropped below 1,000 articles. I know it'll only last until some helpful soul vomits out another 50 update needed tags for each of ''[[Field Report 2765: Periphery]]'' and ''[[Experimental Technical Readout: Primitives, Volume 4]]'', but I thought it was worth marking the occasion. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 03:25, 10 November 2014 (PST)
 
:::::Congratulations! And thanks for your hard work on this!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 03:35, 10 November 2014 (PST)
 
::::::Ha! And I can tell everyone that I participated in that effort, after I removed one Update Needed tag yesterday. :) On a more serious note, you know how I feel about that tag. I've just added a clarification in the template description that should hopefully limit the amount of tagging we're seeing to more reasonable and workable levels. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:19, 10 November 2014 (PST)
 
:::::::Yeah, I know you're not a fan. After doing this, I can see why you're not a fan of the tag. Fingers crossed that the tagging will slow down.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:40, 10 November 2014 (PST)
 
::::::::Personally, I'd be a much bigger fan of the Update Needed tag if, and only if, the intersection on the plotted Venn diagram between "people who put Update Needed tags on articles" and "people who update articles and remove Update needed tags" was considerably larger than it currently is... [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 06:55, 10 November 2014 (PST)
 
:::::::::Agreed. But at least there are multiple Updates Needed that come from the [[Record Sheets: Vehicle Annex, IndustrialMechs & Exoskeletons]] product. Those should be really quick to get updated. That will reduce the count by about 40.
 
:::::::::What really has me nervous is Handbook: House Kurita. As soon as that comes out I think we'll see a flurry of new "update needed" tags appearing.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:37, 10 November 2014 (PST)
 
::::::::::I'm down to the last couple of planets needing updates from Dark Age Republic Worlds (3130)... could you possibly work your spreadsheet magic and give me another list of articles to update from a single source? I'm thinking something like ''Jihad Hot Spots: Terra'' could be good, as I'm sure I've seen a few planets that just need updates now from there. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:17, 9 December 2014 (PST)
 
  
==Vehicle Annex record Sheets==
+
== Don't admin tired (or angry) ==
Hi Mbear, do you think you can spare me some of the efforts to update the units needed to be updated.  I wrote many of the industrial Mechs ones. Do you mind me doing them, I have some time today to work on. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 07:46, 4 December 2014 (PST)
+
 
:No problem at all. I can work on some other stuff.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 08:49, 4 December 2014 (PST)
+
I was going thru the motions of dealing with the spambot when I saw you had already done some deletions. I blocked, but wondered if you had merged it with anonymous; when I saw you hadn't I went to do so, but because I was thinking of ''you'', I copied your name into the merge command. Thank Nic you were in the protected group! As the protected group warning popped up, I was still in disblief: "No! Did I just delete Mbear?!" --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:04, 2 October 2017 (EDT)
:::Cool, I need something to do here. People keep beating me to it before i can get started. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 10:32, 4 December 2014 (PST)
+
:'''sigh''' I knew it. Everyone IS out to get me. ;)--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2017 (EDT)
==Unit Update 3145==
+
:: Nic is in your corner (for the moment), so you've got that going for you. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 14:55, 3 October 2017 (EDT)
As per your request, I'm slowly working military unit articles you requested me to work on. I've done the [[2nd Loyalty Defenders]] unless there some hidden information somewhere about them. They were invented for FM:3145, so I doubt they're else where. I'm moving on to the 7th Andurien Calvary as per to the list you gave me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 06:55, 19 December 2014 (PST)
+
 
 +
==BattleCorp's Battletech style guide==
 +
 
 +
Not sure if you wanted to update your link on your userpage to [[https://web.archive.org/web/20170628225012/http://www.battlecorps.com/BC2/static.php?page=15 this one]] as your old link doesn't go anywhere anymore.--[[User:Deadfire|Deadfire]] ([[User talk:Deadfire|talk]]) 16:46, 4 January 2018 (EST)
 +
 
 +
==Mechwarrior 1==
 +
Hello. As of now, the site has a number of download links for all Mechwarrior games on various platforms and so on. I'd like to ask you guys to consider giving a link to the Sharp X68000 and PC-9801 versions of Mechwarrior 1. They're abandonware and it's quite hard to track the ROMs down nowadays. It could very well become impossible in the not so distant future which would be a shame as they've made a bigger mark on Battletech than any version of MW2, MW3 or MC could ever dream of. Plus, the PC-98 version of the game is practically the only one playable by today's standards which is quite an issue when it comes to people trying out MW1.
 +
As of now, there's functional links to download floppy images for the games:
 +
<br>X68000 floppies - http://78.213.180.135:5080/mame/index.php?name=btech/x68k_flop (as btech.zip in the upper right corner)
 +
<br>PC-9801 floppies - https://mega.nz/#F!F59WkSqQ!quGKSFIswBgv0rxAAaF8Pg!ctEDjaKL (Under は, find 【PC98】バトルテック.rar)
 +
[[User:Adridos|Adridos]] ([[User talk:Adridos|talk]]) 20:25, 14 February 2018 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:The right person to ask about this would be our site bureaucrat [[User:Nicjansma]]. Nobody else can add stuff to the download section (which has been in need of a workover for a decade now anyways). :) I've dropped a note in Nic's talk page to perhaps look into this. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 05:38, 15 February 2018 (EST)
 +
 
 +
::Wow, awesome findAdded to: http://www.sarna.net/files/programs/games/battletech_ubawareta_seihai/ [[User:Nicjansma|Nicjansma]] ([[User talk:Nicjansma|talk]]) 20:33, 26 March 2018 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==WIP tag==
 +
Morning, Mbear. I just stumbled across your question regarding pages under construction ("Is there a way to list all pages with the underconstruction tag on them?" - on your profile page). I just happened to do [[:Category:WIP|exactly that]] a few days back. This can also be found on the [[BattleTechWiki:ToDo|To Do List]] (on the Sidebar).--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:51, 25 May 2018 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Advanced Technology Year ==
 +
 
 +
It may seem like a stupid question but what is an "Advanced Technology Year"? Is it different in universe from year available?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 08:37, 21 February 2019 (EST)
 +
:The idea is to track what year technologies move from Experimental Rules to Advanced Rules to Tournament Legal rules. Obviously I need to re-write that for clarity. --[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 08:39, 21 February 2019 (EST)
 +
::Ah ok... To me the prototype/year introduced seemed to essentially have it covered but I had not thught about all the rules stuff as I tend to think in universe terms.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:13, 21 February 2019 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Star League commands order ==
 +
 
 +
Hi Mbear,
 +
 
 +
I've seen that the Star League commands order is different from the rest. Units assigned in sub-level commands do appear also in the root (something that does not happen in other Military Commands Categories. Am I right if I consider this Category incorrectly done?
 +
 
 +
I also think there are categories missing that should help reorganize this a bit better? The level of sub commands can be huge, and I do not even know which is the best way to order them.
 +
 
 +
I tried to make this a general query, but have no idea on how to do it.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 10:31, 18 July 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:I wouldn't say "incorrectly done" exactly, but I see your point. I '''think''' what happened was the original SLDF commands category was created before FM:SLDF and other Star League era sourcebooks were published. Going by the limited information available in ''[[The Star League]]'', this original category was probably enough.
 +
 
 +
:Now that we have more info, you're probably right about a reorganization. By "sub commands" I assume you're talking about something like a category for units that are part of [[1st Army (Star League)]], then a category for [[I Corps (Star League)]]'s constituent commands, etc. I see no problem with that. (In fact I think we started a category for Army and Corps level organizations: ([[:Category:Star League Defense Force Commands - Army]] and [[:Category:Star League Defense Force Corps]]) but frankly my job picked up and I haven't had a lot of time to keep working on Sarna.)
 +
 
 +
:I also just created a new category as an example: [[:Category:Star League Defense Force Auxiliary Corps]] which lists the various Auxiliary Corps used in the Reunification War.
 +
 
 +
:However, I wouldn't recommend removing any existing specialist categories, like [[:Category:Star League Defense Force Commands - Infantry Division]].
 +
 
 +
:Does that help at all or have I just confused the issue even more?--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 09:06, 19 July 2019 (EDT)
 +
::Thanks for the tip. That was my idea, and delete existing categories was not in my mind :).--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 11:44, 19 July 2019 (EDT)
 +
:::my problem with including units in say 1st Army is that if a casual user does not know it is part of 1st Army we have just made finding it exponentially harder not easier. 1st Sword of Light will always be easy to find because it shares the name of the next command level up.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 11:54, 19 July 2019 (EDT)
 +
::::OK. That's a valid concern. How about we add the subcommand categories as described, but keep the giant list that Pserratv is complaining about? (Sorry Pserratv.) That way it's still broken down in a more manageable size, but the list is still there for casual users.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:56, 22 July 2019 (EDT)
 +
:::::If we do this, and I accept any ruling and I understand also why you are worried, we need to do first something on the commands now in General as... well, otherwise they'll be flooded and never be seen again. I accept suggestions. As per returning also some of them to both general and subcategories, which is the ruling? We are taling on more than 800 commands, not an easy decision to take on what should be at Category General level and what not.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 15:31, 22 July 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Proposed Organization of the Star League Forces (final) ==
 +
 
 +
I've created and explained a proposal here: [[:Category talk:Star League Defense Force Commands]], could you review and share your insights?--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 08:55, 7 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Image Categories ==
 +
 
 +
Hi Mbear,
 +
 
 +
Do you know how the system maps are generated? All those images don't have a category and this makes the [https://www.sarna.net/wiki/Special:UncategorizedFiles Uncategorized files] not very useful as from the first 1000 thousand maybe 95% images as these ones. And I do not want to put them in a category as this might affect the "program" that generates them. Do you know who can help? Maybe when the image is generated it can be put in a category like "System Images". I'm asking more people, but do you have any idea?--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 04:24, 8 March 2021 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Discord added ==
 +
 
 +
If you pop onto the Discord, give a shout out to Deadfire, me, or one of the other admins and we'll "promote" you.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:27, 10 June 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Thank you. ==
 +
 
 +
Hey mbear,
 +
 
 +
Thank you for having a look at the [[Template:InfoBoxMilitaryCommand]], I had told Pserratv I was going to ask you to look at it but I had real life stuff to do. When I came back you had done it on your own. Massively appreciated. Have an award [[File:PS 3sol.jpg|Problem Solver Award, 7th ribbon]]. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 11:08, 28 June 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Charts for Battletech ==
 +
Hello mbear, can you please take a look at the following site: https://www.sarna.net/wiki/User:Neuling/charts and tell me your opinion about it. My goal is to greate a chart to see the expierence difference of an Brigade during a specific time. The next chart shows the strucure of the FWL navy in 2765. I had more chart about the different structures within an military organisation like the Republic of the Inner Sphere and even the loses of the SLDF from 264 to 2784. With best regards [[neuling]].
 +
:I think my request wil not get a response. My goal was not to include the charts in the wiki. But you have your reasons, which are unknown to me, for not communicating about that topic. I hope you can help me that time. Can we include anchor in that wiki or is that something for Nic to discuss. [[neuling]]
 +
 
 +
== Units infobox template ==
 +
 
 +
I see that you are updating some of them. Are you folowing some process to select which to upgraqe? I see a bit of ecery thing so I asked.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 15:18, 13 July 2021 (EDT)
 +
:Not really. I'm going by the "What Links Here" link from the template. Starting at the end of the list and moving forward so I can see the list shrinking.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:59, 14 July 2021 (EDT)
 +
::Although now that I've done some, I've decided to focus on brigade/organization levels. For example, the Protectorate Militia, and then the Dieron Regulars.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup>
 +
:::I've done several of them already (see [https://www.sarna.net/wiki/User:Pserratv#InfoBoxMilitaryCommand my page]). We should try to coordinate :).--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 03:44, 24 August 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==Nigel Sortek==
 +
Hey Mbear, just so you know, I removed your addition of [[Nigel Sortek]] to the [[House Sortek]] page. The reason why is because he is already in the family tree, and I am slowly trying to switch over the "Known family members" to "'''Other''' known family members" as I figure out how various people are related. [[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:26, 30 August 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Community Service Award, 3rd ribbon ==
 +
 
 +
[[File:CommServ_2bol.jpg|Community Service Award, 3rd ribbon]]<br>
 +
Thank you very much for crafting/researching/conjuring this bit of much-wanted media-wiki code. This is going to be extremely helpful. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:59, 31 August 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== My Redlinks ==
 +
Hiya, saw that you purged my redlinks - specifically, the [[BattleTech rulebooks]]. That's a summary article I intend to write yet, to show how the BT rules evolved over time. In this sense, it's going to be a companion article to the Boxed set article that shows how the basic boxed set product evolved over time. I've taken the liberty to revert your cleanup and restore my messy redlinks, as a reminder to myself to get that article up and running. If nothing happens in a few months' time, feel free to kick me in the shins about it (or delete the links again, in which case I won't object anymore). :) [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 14:37, 16 September 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==Options for new layout==
 +
Hello Mbear, I communicated with Dmon about a new layout for the existing military organization sites. He think Version 2 is acceptable. Before I start anything, I ask the Mods for their approval. The  site for the version is [[User:Neuling/test-rework]]. Tell me your opinion about it and perhaps we found common ground. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 16:03, 27 September 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==House Zibler==
 +
Hey Mbear,
 +
 
 +
Just a heads up that I re-removed most of the characters you added from the Crazy Eights as they where in the family tree. The intent is that the bottom section is "Other family members" who we don't have a spot for in the tree.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Infoboxmilitary command exercise ==
 +
 
 +
Hi Mbear,
 +
 
 +
I finished clan commands and wanted to follow with this, but found out that you have already amended maybe all of them. Are any commands in this category you have not touched? List below.
 +
 
 +
Pending:
 +
* ComStar Commands
 +
* Draconis Combine Commands
 +
* Federated Commonwealth Commands
 +
* Federated Suns Commands
 +
* Free Worlds League Commands
 +
* Lyran Commands
 +
* Magistracy of Canopus Commands
 +
* Mercenary Commands
 +
* Rasalhague Dominion Commands
 +
* Raven Alliance Commands
 +
* Republic of the Sphere Commands
 +
* Rim Provisional Government Commands
 +
* Rim Worlds Republic Commands
 +
* Star League Defense Force Commands
 +
* Taurian Concordat Commands
 +
* Word of Blake Commands
 +
 
 +
Regards.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 11:47, 6 October 2021 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 11:47, 6 October 2021

Something you want to say? Just let me know![edit]

Archived[edit]


LX Corps[edit]

Hi, i removed the image it is wrong, i uploade the correct.--Doneve (talk) 11:42, 26 January 2016 (PST)

Davion Assault Guards[edit]

Hey Mbear, noticed somebody edited your Davion Assault Guards page, I am going to assume that the user thought it was the "main article" as it where. Since you have not touched the article since 2013 do you think we could possibly retire it to avoid confusion? Cheers --Dmon (talk) 13:01, 4 February 2016 (PST)

Jade Falcon units[edit]

Mbear - yeah, i get the issue. The units in question fought the Kell Hounds, resulting in the death of Daniel Allard. Unfortunately, they weren't mentioned by name. Nevertheless, other sources clear state their presence. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 17:40, 2 June 2016 (PDT)

Victroy Ranger units[edit]

Hi, i see you removed the update needed tags, i dont want to add tags for Field Manual: 3145 the pages need to update by this source, can you do this when you found time, cheers.--Doneve (talk) 07:11, 7 June 2016 (PDT)

SLDF Units[edit]

Hi, started to add some updates to the SLDF units, but I see it is one of your pet projects. I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but if you need any help just let me know. Dark Jaguar (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2016 (PDT)

St. Ives Sentinels[edit]

Hello. The Armored Infantry and Mounted Fusiliers are the 1st and 2nd St. Ives Sentinels. You listed them as dead and created new pages for the 1st and 2nd. What do you want me to do about them? Henryjones000 (talk) 12:44, 13 April 2017 (EDT)

Spammers[edit]

I saw your efforts to delete all the spambots earlier, just wanted to say thanks for all your hard work as an admin. It's really appreciated, you deserve this award. Vandal Cop Award, 3rd ribbon Dark Jaguar (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

In the same vein, thank you for standing in the trenches and fighting off the soulless spambots with me and BrokenMnemonic. Have another Vandal Cop award on me. (4th ribbon, right?) Frabby (talk) 03:21, 13 July 2017 (EDT)

Don't admin tired (or angry)[edit]

I was going thru the motions of dealing with the spambot when I saw you had already done some deletions. I blocked, but wondered if you had merged it with anonymous; when I saw you hadn't I went to do so, but because I was thinking of you, I copied your name into the merge command. Thank Nic you were in the protected group! As the protected group warning popped up, I was still in disblief: "No! Did I just delete Mbear?!" --Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:04, 2 October 2017 (EDT)

sigh I knew it. Everyone IS out to get me. ;)--Mbear(talk) 06:56, 3 October 2017 (EDT)
Nic is in your corner (for the moment), so you've got that going for you. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 14:55, 3 October 2017 (EDT)

BattleCorp's Battletech style guide[edit]

Not sure if you wanted to update your link on your userpage to [this one] as your old link doesn't go anywhere anymore.--Deadfire (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2018 (EST)

Mechwarrior 1[edit]

Hello. As of now, the site has a number of download links for all Mechwarrior games on various platforms and so on. I'd like to ask you guys to consider giving a link to the Sharp X68000 and PC-9801 versions of Mechwarrior 1. They're abandonware and it's quite hard to track the ROMs down nowadays. It could very well become impossible in the not so distant future which would be a shame as they've made a bigger mark on Battletech than any version of MW2, MW3 or MC could ever dream of. Plus, the PC-98 version of the game is practically the only one playable by today's standards which is quite an issue when it comes to people trying out MW1. As of now, there's functional links to download floppy images for the games:
X68000 floppies - http://78.213.180.135:5080/mame/index.php?name=btech/x68k_flop (as btech.zip in the upper right corner)
PC-9801 floppies - https://mega.nz/#F!F59WkSqQ!quGKSFIswBgv0rxAAaF8Pg!ctEDjaKL (Under は, find 【PC98】バトルテック.rar) Adridos (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2018 (EST)

The right person to ask about this would be our site bureaucrat User:Nicjansma. Nobody else can add stuff to the download section (which has been in need of a workover for a decade now anyways). :) I've dropped a note in Nic's talk page to perhaps look into this. Frabby (talk) 05:38, 15 February 2018 (EST)
Wow, awesome find. Added to: http://www.sarna.net/files/programs/games/battletech_ubawareta_seihai/ Nicjansma (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2018 (EDT)

WIP tag[edit]

Morning, Mbear. I just stumbled across your question regarding pages under construction ("Is there a way to list all pages with the underconstruction tag on them?" - on your profile page). I just happened to do exactly that a few days back. This can also be found on the To Do List (on the Sidebar).--Revanche (talk|contribs) 09:51, 25 May 2018 (EDT)

Advanced Technology Year[edit]

It may seem like a stupid question but what is an "Advanced Technology Year"? Is it different in universe from year available?--Dmon (talk) 08:37, 21 February 2019 (EST)

The idea is to track what year technologies move from Experimental Rules to Advanced Rules to Tournament Legal rules. Obviously I need to re-write that for clarity. --Mbear(talk) 08:39, 21 February 2019 (EST)
Ah ok... To me the prototype/year introduced seemed to essentially have it covered but I had not thught about all the rules stuff as I tend to think in universe terms.--Dmon (talk) 12:13, 21 February 2019 (EST)

Star League commands order[edit]

Hi Mbear,

I've seen that the Star League commands order is different from the rest. Units assigned in sub-level commands do appear also in the root (something that does not happen in other Military Commands Categories. Am I right if I consider this Category incorrectly done?

I also think there are categories missing that should help reorganize this a bit better? The level of sub commands can be huge, and I do not even know which is the best way to order them.

I tried to make this a general query, but have no idea on how to do it.--Pserratv (talk) 10:31, 18 July 2019 (EDT)

I wouldn't say "incorrectly done" exactly, but I see your point. I think what happened was the original SLDF commands category was created before FM:SLDF and other Star League era sourcebooks were published. Going by the limited information available in The Star League, this original category was probably enough.
Now that we have more info, you're probably right about a reorganization. By "sub commands" I assume you're talking about something like a category for units that are part of 1st Army (Star League), then a category for I Corps (Star League)'s constituent commands, etc. I see no problem with that. (In fact I think we started a category for Army and Corps level organizations: (Category:Star League Defense Force Commands - Army and Category:Star League Defense Force Corps) but frankly my job picked up and I haven't had a lot of time to keep working on Sarna.)
I also just created a new category as an example: Category:Star League Defense Force Auxiliary Corps which lists the various Auxiliary Corps used in the Reunification War.
However, I wouldn't recommend removing any existing specialist categories, like Category:Star League Defense Force Commands - Infantry Division.
Does that help at all or have I just confused the issue even more?--Mbear(talk) 09:06, 19 July 2019 (EDT)
Thanks for the tip. That was my idea, and delete existing categories was not in my mind :).--Pserratv (talk) 11:44, 19 July 2019 (EDT)
my problem with including units in say 1st Army is that if a casual user does not know it is part of 1st Army we have just made finding it exponentially harder not easier. 1st Sword of Light will always be easy to find because it shares the name of the next command level up.--Dmon (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2019 (EDT)
OK. That's a valid concern. How about we add the subcommand categories as described, but keep the giant list that Pserratv is complaining about? (Sorry Pserratv.) That way it's still broken down in a more manageable size, but the list is still there for casual users.--Mbear(talk) 11:56, 22 July 2019 (EDT)
If we do this, and I accept any ruling and I understand also why you are worried, we need to do first something on the commands now in General as... well, otherwise they'll be flooded and never be seen again. I accept suggestions. As per returning also some of them to both general and subcategories, which is the ruling? We are taling on more than 800 commands, not an easy decision to take on what should be at Category General level and what not.--Pserratv (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2019 (EDT)

Proposed Organization of the Star League Forces (final)[edit]

I've created and explained a proposal here: Category talk:Star League Defense Force Commands, could you review and share your insights?--Pserratv (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2019 (EDT)

Image Categories[edit]

Hi Mbear,

Do you know how the system maps are generated? All those images don't have a category and this makes the Uncategorized files not very useful as from the first 1000 thousand maybe 95% images as these ones. And I do not want to put them in a category as this might affect the "program" that generates them. Do you know who can help? Maybe when the image is generated it can be put in a category like "System Images". I'm asking more people, but do you have any idea?--Pserratv (talk) 04:24, 8 March 2021 (EST)

Discord added[edit]

If you pop onto the Discord, give a shout out to Deadfire, me, or one of the other admins and we'll "promote" you.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:27, 10 June 2021 (EDT)

Thank you.[edit]

Hey mbear,

Thank you for having a look at the Template:InfoBoxMilitaryCommand, I had told Pserratv I was going to ask you to look at it but I had real life stuff to do. When I came back you had done it on your own. Massively appreciated. Have an award Problem Solver Award, 7th ribbon. --Dmon (talk) 11:08, 28 June 2021 (EDT)

Charts for Battletech[edit]

Hello mbear, can you please take a look at the following site: https://www.sarna.net/wiki/User:Neuling/charts and tell me your opinion about it. My goal is to greate a chart to see the expierence difference of an Brigade during a specific time. The next chart shows the strucure of the FWL navy in 2765. I had more chart about the different structures within an military organisation like the Republic of the Inner Sphere and even the loses of the SLDF from 264 to 2784. With best regards neuling.

I think my request wil not get a response. My goal was not to include the charts in the wiki. But you have your reasons, which are unknown to me, for not communicating about that topic. I hope you can help me that time. Can we include anchor in that wiki or is that something for Nic to discuss. neuling

Units infobox template[edit]

I see that you are updating some of them. Are you folowing some process to select which to upgraqe? I see a bit of ecery thing so I asked.--Pserratv (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2021 (EDT)

Not really. I'm going by the "What Links Here" link from the template. Starting at the end of the list and moving forward so I can see the list shrinking.--Mbear(talk) 07:59, 14 July 2021 (EDT)
Although now that I've done some, I've decided to focus on brigade/organization levels. For example, the Protectorate Militia, and then the Dieron Regulars.--Mbear(talk)
I've done several of them already (see my page). We should try to coordinate :).--Pserratv (talk) 03:44, 24 August 2021 (EDT)

Nigel Sortek[edit]

Hey Mbear, just so you know, I removed your addition of Nigel Sortek to the House Sortek page. The reason why is because he is already in the family tree, and I am slowly trying to switch over the "Known family members" to "Other known family members" as I figure out how various people are related. Dmon (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2021 (EDT)

Community Service Award, 3rd ribbon[edit]

Community Service Award, 3rd ribbon
Thank you very much for crafting/researching/conjuring this bit of much-wanted media-wiki code. This is going to be extremely helpful. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:59, 31 August 2021 (EDT)

My Redlinks[edit]

Hiya, saw that you purged my redlinks - specifically, the BattleTech rulebooks. That's a summary article I intend to write yet, to show how the BT rules evolved over time. In this sense, it's going to be a companion article to the Boxed set article that shows how the basic boxed set product evolved over time. I've taken the liberty to revert your cleanup and restore my messy redlinks, as a reminder to myself to get that article up and running. If nothing happens in a few months' time, feel free to kick me in the shins about it (or delete the links again, in which case I won't object anymore). :) Frabby (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2021 (EDT)

Options for new layout[edit]

Hello Mbear, I communicated with Dmon about a new layout for the existing military organization sites. He think Version 2 is acceptable. Before I start anything, I ask the Mods for their approval. The  site for the version is User:Neuling/test-rework. Tell me your opinion about it and perhaps we found common ground. Neuling (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2021 (EDT)

House Zibler[edit]

Hey Mbear,

Just a heads up that I re-removed most of the characters you added from the Crazy Eights as they where in the family tree. The intent is that the bottom section is "Other family members" who we don't have a spot for in the tree.--Dmon (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (EDT)

Infoboxmilitary command exercise[edit]

Hi Mbear,

I finished clan commands and wanted to follow with this, but found out that you have already amended maybe all of them. Are any commands in this category you have not touched? List below.

Pending:

  • ComStar Commands
  • Draconis Combine Commands
  • Federated Commonwealth Commands
  • Federated Suns Commands
  • Free Worlds League Commands
  • Lyran Commands
  • Magistracy of Canopus Commands
  • Mercenary Commands
  • Rasalhague Dominion Commands
  • Raven Alliance Commands
  • Republic of the Sphere Commands
  • Rim Provisional Government Commands
  • Rim Worlds Republic Commands
  • Star League Defense Force Commands
  • Taurian Concordat Commands
  • Word of Blake Commands

Regards.--Pserratv (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2021 (EDT)