Difference between revisions of "User talk:Doneve"

m (Protected "User talk:Doneve" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(433 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
 
__toc__
 
__toc__
 
{{Welcome|Doneve|Ewald}}
 
{{Welcome|Doneve|Ewald}}
  
=Archived=
+
=Archives=
[[User talk:Doneve/Archive1]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive2 April 2010-January 2011]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive3 January 2011-December 2011]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive4 January 2012-December 2012]]
+
[[User talk:Doneve/Archive1]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive2 April 2010-January 2011]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive3 January 2011-December 2011]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive4 January 2012-December 2012]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive5 January 2013-January 2014]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive6 January 2014-January 2015]]<br>[[User talk:Doneve/Archive7 January 2015-December 2015]]
 
 
==Happy New Year==
 
Hy Doneve,
 
 
 
I'd like to wish you and your family a Happy New Year - I hope that 2013 is a great year for everyone.
 
 
 
If nothing else, TPTB have started it off with [[Objectives: Periphery]], which seems like a good start to me {{Emoticon| ;) }} [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:46, 1 January 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
:Hy BM, sorry for the late response, i wish you and your family also a Happy New Year.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:57, 2 January 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== XTRO Primitives Vol 3  ==
 
 
 
Doneve,
 
Just FYI: I undid your formatting changes to the TOC of XTRO Primitives Vol. 3. Battlemechs, Aerospace Fighters, DropShips, Jumpships, Warships are all italicized, but battle armor and combat vehicles aren't. This is how [http://www.battlecorps.com/BC2/static.php?page=15 CGL does it] and follows the [[Policy:Italics|italics policy]]. --[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:16, 3 January 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
==Planet InfoBox==
 
''Copied from my talk page''
 
Mbear, as the resident expert on infobox construction, is there any way to amend the Template:InfoBoxPlanetStandard template so that if the image is already less than 225 pixels in width, it isn't increased automatically to a width of 225 pixels? Some of the info boxes (like [[Denbar]]) are suffering from image bloat because the long, think planetary flags are being scaled up dramatically... [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:27, 9 January 2013 (PST)
 
:I don't know off the top of my head. Let me look into it.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:17, 10 January 2013 (PST)
 
::Updated the InfoboxPlanetStandard to include a new paramater: '''imagewidth'''. If you have an image less than 225px, you can enter the width in pixels on this line to show image w/o scaling. Leaving line blank will assume width of 225px.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:32, 10 January 2013 (PST)
 
:::Excellent, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 08:22, 10 January 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== Skye Rangers Commando ==
 
 
 
Doneve - So in the back of FM:Lyran Alliance, there's a color pic of a ''Commando'' in Skye Ranger colors. Could you upload this one for me? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 10:50, 16 January 2013 (PST)
 
:Done :).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:50, 16 January 2013 (PST)
 
:: Thanks! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 22:14, 16 January 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== Task Force Serpent ==
 
Hy Doneve,
 
 
 
Do you know where a list of the WarShips assigned to [[Task Force Serpent]] could be found? I notice from the Essex page that several ComStar vessels apparently went, but I've checked all the sourcebooks I can think of and haven't turned anything up. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:29, 18 January 2013 (PST)
 
:Ok! i look what i can do for you.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 22:12, 19 January 2013 (PST)
 
::Okidoky, the source is [[Twilight of the Clans]] sourcebook, p. 8, and on other pages, i hope this helps.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 22:21, 19 January 2013 (PST)
 
:::Hy, that's great, thank you {{Emoticon| :) }}
 
 
 
== Rewritten: 4th Skye Rangers ==
 
 
 
For your approval, I give you the [[4th Skye Rangers]]. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:32, 21 January 2013 (PST)
 
:That's one heck of a re-write.  Very sharp looking article. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 10:58, 30 January 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
==Images==
 
Hello Doneve!
 
 
 
Nic deleted the unused Viper images. :(  But that's OK.  I dropped him a note and said hello and apologized about cluttering up his database.  I explained about the holidays and stuff too.  He said it was cool, and to upload the images any time.  So...  If you are cool with it as well, could you please re-upload Natalie Breen for me? :)  (page 91 ER: 3052) I just finished her bio, its a good one. :)  And it is also for your approval, or anyone else too. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 10:35, 30 January 2013 (PST)
 
:Okidoki, work in progress :).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 10:38, 30 January 2013 (PST)
 
::Thank you much, as always.  More to come. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 12:11, 30 January 2013 (PST)
 
::: Hello Doneve :)  Could you re-upload Perigard Zalman from pages 92 of ER: 3052, and page 98 of ER:3062?  And while in the second book, possibly Steel Viper Alpha Galaxy, Beta Galaxy and Gamma Galaxy insignia from page 63 and 64 of ER:3062.  I'll put them with their respective galaxies right away so they will definitely be used...  and I'll use the Alpha galaxy pic in an article that is getting close.  I know you are busy, so whenever is cool, I'll keep an eye open.--[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 22:17, 13 February 2013 (PST)
 
::::Hy Rebs, i re-upload the pics when iam at home.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 07:23, 14 February 2013 (PST)
 
:::::No problem! The galaxy ones will be good for lots of characters, so I was also wondering if maybe there were color ones available.  I'll have to go searching... --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 22:41, 14 February 2013 (PST)
 
::::::OK, Zalman is approaching the finished state. And the images for the galaxies were already here.  My bad.  This will be a good one! [[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 23:55, 15 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
==Individual WarShips==
 
Hi Doneve.  Had question for you.  Why are you making so many sub-directories for individual ships? There aren't that many ships that have extensive information on them them to warrent their own individual articles. I originally made individual ship category, because there only handful ships that had extensive detail to warrent its down profile. Now there ones for individual ships of each Class, whats going on?-- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 18:20, 4 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
: Please take a look on your talk page.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]])
 
 
 
::Doneve, i was looking how you were splitting up the Named vessels into their own files.  Category for [[Point Barrow (Vessel)]] is listed in the Vigiliant Class category, yet the ship's article says its Robinson Class Transport. Could you double check your linking? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 12:15, 10 February 2013 (PST)
 
:::Fixed, it was an copy and past error, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:22, 10 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
Hy Doneve,
 
Thanks for helping with the individual ships {{Emoticon| :) }} There are thousands of them tucked away in various books. I'm sorry I'm not helping more at the moment - I'm laid up with a nasty chest infection, and while I'm getting better pretty quickly, I've not had a lot of time to get on with editing because the convention work has been pretty busy this week. I'm hoping that'll change this weekend though!<br>
 
One thing I thought I should mention is the convention on naming ships, which should in theory be the same here as it is on wikipedia - while a ship's name is always italicized, the prefix denoting the service shouldn't be. It's not something that TPTB are 100% consistent with in their books, but it's something I've been trying to follow here. It makes life a bit frustrating, because italics and wikilinks don't really work, but it's the technically correct way of naming them. So, ships like the ''Inquisitor'' should be the SLS ''Inquisitor'', rather than the ''SLS Inquisitor''. Does that make sense?<br>
 
I've been nosing through Historical: Operation Klondike (I have been catching up on my reading a bit) and it's a little frustrating that so many WarShips are involved in battles, but so few get named. It also makes me wonder when the Clans started renaming WarShips, although I'm not sure there's ever going to be a clear answer on that. It's also got me wondering about the prefixes and where they come from - we use a lot here on Sarna, and I've seen them used over on CGL a lot, particularly all the different ones for the Clans, but I've not found many sources in canon where they actually specify the clan prefixes. The Blake Documents confirmed CIH for Clan Ice Hellion and CJF for Clan Jade Falcon, but Frabby asked me about what prefix the Steel Vipers use, given that ComStar seems to have used CSV (ComStar Vessel?), and I couldn't find anything in canon. Any ideas? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 05:40, 13 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
:Hy BM, at first good luck for your healing process. I am glad to help a little by the massiv amount of various warships. As second, we italic the full name of a warship like ''SLS Inquisitor'', for the prefixes iam with you, there is no clear canon source, named for the most of the vessels, like some of the other clans, [CIH], and [CJF] is stated in a cannon source, i think a talk to the CBT Forum is the best way to clear this.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 10:29, 13 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
==Individual Vessel infobox==
 
Hi Doneve, in the articles you're creating you apparently copy & paste a template using "infoBoxIndividualSpacegoingVessel". That infobox doesn't exist under that name though, it's a redirect to "Template:InfoBoxIndividualVessel". I admit that this isn't important, but I find it irritating to have articles with a redirected infobox. I'm not asking you to go over all the past articles again, but may I suggest that you use the correct template name for future articles to avoid making use of that redirect.<br />Thank you. :) [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 09:33, 19 February 2013 (PST)
 
:Hy Frabby, i set up the redirect to the infobox, can you delete one of the infoboxes, then we work only from one infobox, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 10:16, 19 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== Contact ==
 
 
 
Hey Doneve - how can I contact you outside of the wiki? Thanks. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 12:55, 14 February 2013 (PST)
 
: Sent you a PM on that forum. Thanks. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 20:29, 17 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
==Image Discussion==
 
Hey Doneve!  I uploaded Perigard Zalman...  I just wanted to know, did I do it right?  Was there anything I missed?  If everything is a go, I'll put it into use. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 11:20, 16 February 2013 (PST)
 
:Thanks for the brush ups on the image files.  Nice to know I can take care of that end in the future. {{Emoticon| :) }} --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 20:12, 16 February 2013 (PST)
 
::Dude, and thank you big-time for the Zalman quote.  That one is perfect. :) --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 16:59, 17 February 2013 (PST)
 
:::I think i found more quotes provided on the CCG Cards for your clan bio articles, i have a eye on this ;).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 17:04, 17 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== Product infobox ==
 
 
 
I've asked Nic to make a change to a CSS file. (I don't have access to it, otherwise I'd just do it.)--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 09:40, 20 February 2013 (PST)
 
:Ok, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 09:57, 20 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== WarShip Pages ==
 
Hy Doneve,
 
 
 
I'd like to give you this assistance appreciated award as thanks for the way you're tidying up after me as I plow through the new ship articles here on Sarna. I'm not getting much time to edit at home because of the Vidukon work I'm doing, and at work I don't get as much editing time as I'd like, so it can take me a fair while to write the articles, set up the redirects and then edit the WarShip/JumpShip/DropShip variant pages to include all the links. You've been a big help in taking some of that off my hands so I can concentrate on the individual ship articles themselves, and I appreciate that greatly.<br>
 
So, please accept this award, with my thanks: [[File:AA 2sol.jpg|Assistance Appreciated Award, 6th ribbon]] [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 23:52, 25 February 2013 (PST)
 
:Thanks {{Emoticon| :) }}.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 06:19, 26 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
==Combat Vehicle Infobox==
 
Hy Mbear, please can you add a heat sinks row to the combat vehicle infobox, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:02, 26 February 2013 (PST)
 
:Done!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 12:46, 26 February 2013 (PST)
 
::Great thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:48, 26 February 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== Ulric Quote ==
 
 
 
Doneve - I have no problem with you adding it. My concern is that 1) Ulric didn't say it. and 2) It wasn't originally said in regards to him. WoB scripture is way older than the Clan Invasion. The card simply applied it to him for flavor text. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 06:48, 5 March 2013 (PST)
 
 
 
== Objectives: Clans ==
 
Hello Doneve, i missed that Mortiorium date.  However, its four days from now. Its okay leave what i've done alone since there only few days left? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 19:11, 10 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:I know know, i hate the moratorium but we must live with this, but i became also a "Wrangler" ;), in the last two years, and you are a good teacher.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 19:16, 10 March 2013 (PDT)
 
::I've made Wrangler's changes disappear by copying your changes in place. When the moratorium expires, I'll just hit the "roll back" option in the history of the page and Wrangler's additions will arrive again.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:21, 11 March 2013 (PDT)
 
 
 
==Beowulf IIC==
 
Hi Doneve, no offense intended when I removed the Beowulf IIC link from the list in the [[IIC]] article. I'm just too tired to think straight, it should have been made a link to "Beowulf IIC". It was piped to Beowulf#variants though, which is inherently wrong - IIC designs aren't variants, they are 'Mech designs in their own right and need their own article. Btw, I don't own any of the most recent TROs so I don't know where the Beowulf IIC is from. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 14:19, 11 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:The Beowulf IIC is from [[Technical Readout: Prototypes]], Wrangler is on work to add the missing designs, then in next time the red link became blue ;).--14:41, 11 March 2013 (PDT)
 
::I'll be getting at the Beowulf IIC tomorrow when i have chance. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 17:13, 11 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:::Great, thanks a lot to add some missing 'Mech, vehicle, etc. articles, we have a lack when i look on some TRO content, good work Wrangler.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 17:20, 11 March 2013 (PDT)
 
==Puma Tank & Components of Odin==
 
Hi Doneve, i was editing [[Odin Manufacturing]] for the above mentioned Beowulf IIC.  I ran into problem with the components.  You had a [[B-Pod]] launcher called the "Odin" for variant of the [[Puma (Combat Vehicle)|Puma]] Tank.  Now, this was strictly a variant which never had any fluff (i know of) which would have included actual brandnames for its components. The Link for the B-Pod launcher you setup ended up going to the Clan Tank named Odin. I did a fix calling it Odin (B-Pod). I don't mean hurt your feelings, but adding components that aren't named isn't good. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 19:35, 12 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:I know of the problem, some brands are not correct linked and so on, iam in work to change some thinks to clear this, thanks for your support.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 20:21, 12 March 2013 (PDT)
 
 
 
==Enterprise==
 
Hy Doneve,
 
 
 
I notice I gazumped you with the picture of the ''Enterprise'', but I don't think you should delete the version you uploaded, as I think the article can use both. The picture I uploaded is from the record sheet, and shows just the ''Enterprise'' - the picture you uploaded shows the ''Enterprise'' on trials with other ships nearby. I think you should add your picture to the ''Enterprise'' article as a seperate gallery picture at the bottom, personally. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:57, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
 
 
 
==Design Quirks==
 
Hy Mbear, is it ok when i add a design quirks section to the variants you added from [[XTRO: Boondoggles]]?--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:10, 14 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:Sure. I don't know that we need a section though. maybe just a sentence.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:48, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
 
  
==ProtoMech Infobox==
+
== Happy New Year ==
Hy, can you add a comsys and T&T row to the infobox, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 09:51, 7 March 2013 (PST)
+
Hi Doneve,<br>
:done.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:54, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
+
I hope 2016 is a happy, prosperous and healthy year for you and your family. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 00:49, 3 January 2016 (PST)
::Thanks!--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 07:41, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
 
  
==Ares Conventions==
+
== Electra ==
So, is there any actual reason other than gut feeling why you tossed out my summaries of the appendices together with the articles and called me a plagiarist? [[User:Dirk Bastion|Dirk Bastion]] ([[User talk:Dirk Bastion|talk]]) 12:55, 17 March 2013 (PDT)
+
Hi Doneve, I've just updated the article for Electra and I think something odd may be going on with the system tables. Electra, Maia and Merope are all named systems in the Pleiades Cluster, but while both Merope and the Pleiades Cluster appear in the systems table, Maia doesn't. I've only got a small part of the systems spreadsheet with me at work (the systems that begin with D, basically) so I can't check easily here, but could you take a look at your copy when it's sorted for Electra, and see how far away it lists Electra and Maia as being? It may be there's a bug in the spreadsheet. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:41, 28 January 2016 (PST)
:By best will, the content i removed was word for word from [[Era Digest: Age of War]], p. 14-15 and was plagiarized, i don't know if you added the content or another editor, but its a copyright violation, sorry.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 17:48, 17 March 2013 (PDT)
+
:Hu, a bug, ok, Maia has a distance from 1,1114 in my spreed sheet, when i sort to Electra.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 04:19, 28 January 2016 (PST)
::Then you didn't actually look beyond one or two paragraphs: the appendices and addendums were pretty obviously summaries and not copies. I will restore them later today. The articles (which I didn't touch at all previously) I'll re-insert as small summaries as well. Next time please just don't lob off parts of an article on a serious accusation of plagiarism without tossing the author a note or at least put one on the article discussion page. [[User:Dirk Bastion|Dirk Bastion]] ([[User talk:Dirk Bastion|talk]]) 05:14, 18 March 2013 (PDT)
+
::Hiya, I think there may be another bug - I've just been looking at [[Elix]], and it has [[Ashburton]] recorded as being 28.1 LY away. Elix is in the Draconis Combine though, and Ashburton's in the Free Worlds League. Looking at the map in ER: 2750, I think it should be [[Ashio]] rather than Ashburton, but it may mean that a row has gone missing from your copy of the spreadsheet, or maybe some of the data's ended up sorted out of sequence? I went and checked the Ashio page, as Ashio doesn't appear in Elix's system table, and on the Ashio page, Elix is listed as 28.2 LY away, so it should be there. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 03:20, 8 February 2016 (PST)
 +
:::Arg, i see it, i have two copys of the spreadsheet and i used the wrong, sorry my failur grml grml :(.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 03:35, 8 February 2016 (PST)
 +
::::Ah, no harm done. You should be more worried that I've stared at so many planet articles I'm starting to remember where every planet is, and yet I still can't remember what my own phone number is! [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 04:00, 8 February 2016 (PST)
 +
:::::Ha ha ha, I know what you mean, i looked with my wife the Game of Throns series, and after this marathon i was so confused about the story, you know what i mean :).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 16:05, 8 February 2016 (PST)
  
=="ClanJadeFalcon"==
+
==Record Sheets 5: Vehicles==
Thanks for taking action so quickly and clearing this mess up! [[File:VC 3bol.jpg|Vandal Cop Award, 4th ribbon]] [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 00:13, 28 March 2013 (PDT)
+
Umm, Doneve - we already have that article (and cover image) here: [[BattleTech Record Sheets Volume Five: Vehicles]]... Though I have no idea why there wasn't a redirect in place. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 05:18, 31 January 2016 (PST)
:Thanks for the award! It was child vandalism, i keep my eyes open.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 07:58, 28 March 2013 (PDT)
+
:Ups, please delete my new page.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 05:30, 31 January 2016 (PST)
==Record Sheets 3075==
 
Tnx for you message. I discover to late that the moratorium for the RS 3075 is not over. I changed the article to their prevoius versions. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 13:50, 30 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:No problem dude, i hope we have you back with more edits, i know we had a harsh discussion etc. in the past, but no doubt, also some edits from you also welcome.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:54, 30 March 2013 (PDT)
 
::I find a solution to create my projects on other places and hopefully I can fix minor issues on sarna in the near future. With best regards  [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 13:56, 30 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:::I know the places and follow the projects, and you do a really great work. With best regards.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 14:00, 30 March 2013 (PDT)
 
  
==Umbra==
+
== Epsilon ==
Hello Doneve, I used a new way to create the Umbra article. Please tell me if my text is good enough, because I use a spell checker to correct my typo. With best regards. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 12:03, 31 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:The article looks good, i added some links, and fix a typo, good work.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:06, 31 March 2013 (PDT)
 
==Deep Periphery Map==
 
Hello Doneve, I try to create also a map of the Deep Periphery. My new approach is to upload my work and the original editor can decide if he keep is former upload or accept the different version from me. That is the reason that I upload images and create galleries even in the case that the picture is available with some differences. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 14:59, 31 March 2013 (PDT)
 
: The map creation was from Bad Syntax, i forgot to add a note one the file, fell free to uploade new maps, i and [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] appriciate this to bring the Planet Overhaul project forwart, and great to have you back.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 15:16, 31 March 2013 (PDT)
 
  
==Design Quirks==
+
Doneve - Can you upload the Epsilon Regiment insignia from [[Field Manual: Mercenaries, Revised]] ? Thanks! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 14:57, 11 March 2016 (PST)
Hy Mbear, is it ok when i add a design quirks section to the variants you added from [[XTRO: Boondoggles]]?--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:10, 14 March 2013 (PDT)
+
:Yep, i do this. Sorry for not answerd email, i do this next day.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 16:30, 11 March 2016 (PST)
:Sure. I don't know that we need a section though. maybe just a sentence.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:48, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
 
::I want to create a [[Design Quirks]] page, and i need your support, i know you favor a sentence, but i want to list all quirks in a article, can you help me a little bit, to do this, there is a interesting discussion from FedCom Girl to Herb on the BT forum, and i want to bring this idea to sarna.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 18:14, 31 March 2013 (PDT)
 
:::Well, one place to start might be the [[Force Specific Rules]] page, since that's basically what we're talking about. (Force Specific Rules strike me as Design Quirks for units.) There's a general introduction about the Force Specific Rules, and then a section that lists the effects of the various FSRs. Sounds a lot like the Design Quirks page you're looking to create.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:01, 1 April 2013 (PDT)
 
  
==Battle Armor weapons and ammo==
+
== Get well soon ==
Hello Doneve, I had some difficulties to understand that by the Battle Armor weapons the ammunition is not listed by the various designs. Have you a solution for that problem? With best regards [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] ([[User talk:Neuling|talk]]) 01:35, 2 April 2013 (PDT)
 
:At this time i have no solution, the best is you talk to Mbear. Oh and at this point i stard a project to bring up a Design Quirks page, i know its a lot of work on this subject, are you interested to involve in? I figure in the next days some thinks out, from the style of the page and must talk to Herb and FedComGirl, but the best way is you look on Mber's talk page about this discussion.--01:39, 2 April 2013 (PDT)
 
  
== Design Quirks, part 2 ==
+
Doneve - Sorry to hear you're going to the hospital. Get well soon! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 11:36, 17 March 2016 (PDT)
  
Doneve, do you want me to put Design Quirks into the Infoboxes? Then more game related material wouldn't be in the main article, but with the other game-related material (weapons load, BV, etc.)--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 3 April 2013 (PDT)
+
== Planets Spreadsheet ==
:Of course we should probably put this up for community review.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:23, 3 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Hi Doneve,<br>
::This is a good idea, do you put it at first to the SomeGuy/sandbox, i want to see what other's say to this idea, how it works!--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 10:06, 3 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Do you want a copy of the spreadsheet I put together to make producing the nearest system tables a bit easier? It's not particularly elegant, but it saves a certain amount of time typing. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 00:26, 19 April 2016 (PDT)
 +
:Hi, i want absolutly ;) a copy, then i can go on to update the nearby systems table, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 00:29, 19 April 2016 (PDT)
 +
::I'm just home from a boardgames evening (unfortunately, the Thunderbirds crashed and burned, and the Hood probably went on to achieve world domination) and I've uploaded a copy of the spreadsheet here: http://www67.zippyshare.com/v/Ae5DOjBp/file.html - it's got the details for El Giza in it at the moment, as that's the last planet I worked on. If you use Volt's spreadsheet to identify the nearest neighbours, then copy and paste the nearby systems within 60 LY and the distances into the two populated columns on the left, the column on the far right then updates to the code for the bulk of the systems table. You still need to put the header and closing tag on it though, and it won't pick up things like redirects because it works off straight text. You also need to manually add ".0" to those jump distances that are an exact number of light years, as Excel wouldn't display a decimal of zero in a concatenated field for some reason. It saves me quite a bit of time when I'm updating articles - hope it helps. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:32, 19 April 2016 (PDT)
 +
:::Thanks man, i look in it, if i have questions i set up a talk.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:36, 19 April 2016 (PDT)
  
Hy Doneve, I was looking at some of your quirk listings, and I think you may have a problem with the obsolete quirk. At the moment, you're creating each obsolete entry as a new quirk - Obsolete (3028), Obsolete (3050), etc. So, you're creating lots of quirks that are going to be almost identical. I think you'd be better to just list the Quick as "Obsolete", but add the year as a pipe mask - Obsolete|Obsolete (3028), Obsolete|Obsolete (3050), etc. The Obsolete Quirk always has the same meaning - the equipment is obsolete after a certain date - but dates will change all over the place. What's important is that it has the quirk in the first place - from a mechanics point of view, the quirk doesn't care when the year is, that's for players to worry about. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:03, 4 April 2013 (PDT)
+
== Founder's Superior Editor of the Year Award 2014 ==
:Pfff, you are asolutly right, i set up a tag pipe to [Obsolet], thanks for talking to me with this problem.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Doneve, I'm constantly amazed at how much you help with both big and small changes to this wiki. Thank you for being such a great member of this community! [[User:Nicjansma|Nicjansma]] ([[User talk:Nicjansma|talk]]) 06:28, 25 May 2016 (PDT)
  
:: Question: Couldn't we just list the quirks under that particular variant? Just a thought. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 16:04, 4 April 2013 (PDT)
+
==Hello to you to==
:::At the moment i list the quirks in this variant. I wait of Mbear, when he updated the Sandbox/Infobox, think we moved the Design Quirks to the infobox, but i wait for like or not like to do this.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 16:16, 4 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Hey, I just saw the message on my talk page, and frankly I'm not so sure about data mining, but if you want some help adjusting those planet tables, I'd be more than happy to help! -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 13:49, 5 June 2016 (PDT)
::::Sorry, had a busy weekend. Have a look at [[User:Some Guy/Sandbox3]] to see the Design Quirks row added to the sample page. ClanWolverine101, AFAIK, Design Quirks apply to every variant of a particular unit. The [[Sokar]] will always have [[Gas Hog]] for example. If I'm mistaken, let me know.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:11, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
 
:::::To CW, when i take a look in TRO:Proto, p. 73, the Sokar has this design quirks Gas Hog, Poor Workmanship, Improved Targeting/Short Range, Trailer Hitch. As second what we do when we have more variants with quirks, look on the [[Trebuchet]] as example.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 08:58, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
 
  
==Era Report: 3145==
+
== Overview ==
Hello, i was working on the article for hours while you were doing your filler one.  I hope it does not mess you up. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 12:22, 7 April 2013 (PDT)
 
:No problem, dude.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:46, 7 April 2013 (PDT)
 
  
== Design Quirks Sample Page ==
+
Hi, I noticed you deleted the overview section on some of the units I've been working on. There are a lot of units with that section on Sarna and to be honest I think it looks so much better than having text sitting about the contents box. [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 15:55, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
:Yep, i hope i dont step on your teeths, i use this format <nowiki>[<onlyinclude>] [</onlyinclude>]</nowiki> from [[User:Neufeld]] he provide this on some pages as example take a look here [[Donegal Guards]], sadly he leave us, this code is only used for military unit pages and it works very well to include content as a top overview and after this we add h2 or h3 headers for the other infos, make this sense to you, sorry for my bad english...if its not clear to you please set up a talk to my friend BrokenMnemonic he clarify this.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 17:17, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
:: It's how I do my articles now as well, I learned after Doneve edited my formatting on my first couple new unit pages, and I just stuck doing that way.--[[User:Deadfire|Deadfire]] ([[User talk:Deadfire|talk]]) 17:47, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
:::Thanks, I think the expression is step on my feet and you're not. I was just looking for clarification. It's just that there seems to be no "template" page for military units. I've not seen the only include code before, but have seen overview as a section many times.  The headings of the Donegal Guards page you showed doesn't comply with all other military units pages for the H2 headings, so I'm not sure if this is a good example to follow? [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 23:39, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
::::Looking around, I can't see a clear ruling or example - the onlyinclude code looks to be something that's been added as a good idea, rather than via consensus. An example of a page that uses it can be seen here: [[Federated Peacekeeping Forces]]. It's not perfect. The style in which individual pages are written, with the first mention of the article name in the text being placed in bold means that pages that incorporate the onlyinclude text end up with lots of bold in them, as that first mention is invariably inside the onlyinclude text. The ''principle'' of the onlyinclude text is sound - it allows brigade pages to pull in summary information from individual unit articles, updating automatically when the individual pages are updated, avoiding the problem of either things getting missed in higher-level pages when lower-level pages are updated, but it makes the format of higher-level pages inconsistent with the Manual of Style requirements for page formatting, as you end up with a lot of bold text, repeated links, and so on.
 +
::::Without a clear ruling, I think we're probably best off having an editor's debate on whether to adopt or abandon the onlyinclude code, and in what format. A couple of the questions I think would need to be discussed are:
 +
::::If we adopt the onlyinclude code as standard, should it be used in pages other than just military units? I know that Frabby is a fan of having a line of overview text at the top of every page (hence the summary sentence in all of the planets articles) but the number of instances of pages that pull through that onlyinclude text is currently pretty limited - the various major military organization pages are the only clear example I can think of at the moment. Do we want to incorporate onlyinclude tags into planet articles, if there's currently been no need for summary pages on planets that are aggregating together such information? Are we likely to see pages in the future that do look to pull through this information - summaries of corporations/businesses, planet summaries, etc?
 +
::::Given the disruption to the consistency of the formatting, should the onlyinclude text be exempt from the standard formatting requirements such as linking the first instance of a linkable text, bolding the first mention of the article name, and so forth? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:26, 16 June 2016 (PDT)
  
Doneve, I like what you've done on [[Design Quirks]]. The only comment I have is I think you should move the point cost out of the References section and add it to the Game Rules section. That way you don't have to look in two different places for the info, it's all in one paragraph. Maybe something like one of these:
+
== Midway Shipyards ==
  
* '''Atmospheric Flyer'''
+
Hi Doneve I had a look, I don't have Objectives: Draconis Combine, but I changed a bit of the English so it reads more clearly. I don't think their will be any problems with plagiarism. {{Emoticon| :) }} [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 14:30, 14 June 2016 (PDT)
:When operating inside the atmospheric envelope of a planet, AeroSpace units with the Atmsopheric Flyer Quirk receive a bonus to control rolls to reflect the exceptionally stable and highly maneuverable nature of the unit.
+
:Thanks a lot i want to  add mor fluff stuff, and need a double checker is this ok to involve you on my pet project.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 14:33, 14 June 2016 (PDT)
:'''Applicable to:''' AeroSpace Fighters, DropShips and Small Craft. '''Point Cost:''' 3
+
::Yes, not a problem. I'm happy to help. [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 14:45, 14 June 2016 (PDT)
  
* '''Atmospheric Flyer'''
+
==Wolf Garrison Clusters==
:When operating inside the atmospheric envelope of a planet, AeroSpace units with the Atmsopheric Flyer Quirk receive a bonus to control rolls to reflect the exceptionally stable and highly maneuverable nature of the unit.
+
Hey Doneve, I was looking though the editing of the [[Clan Wolf Touman‎‎]] page where you did some 3145 updates. However do we not follow the same clan unit naming structure as others when we make pages for Wolf Garrison Clusters? My example would be that shouldn't [[5th Wolf Garrison (Clan Wolf)]] ‎be simply [[5th Garrison (Clan Wolf)]]? --[[User:Deadfire|Deadfire]] ([[User talk:Deadfire|talk]]) 04:16, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
:'''Applicable to:''' AeroSpace Fighters, DropShips and Small Craft.  
+
:Hi, i dont updated the Clan Wolf Touman page, [[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] do this, i started always by adding missing units i found in the Wolf Empire Deployment tables in [[Field Manual: 3145]] and i want to switch to [[Field Manual: Updates]] and [[Objective Raids]], i checked [[5th Garrison (Clan Wolf)]] and the correct name is 5th Wolf Garrison, cheers.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 04:23, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
:'''Point Cost:''' 3
+
::Sorry I meant more the pages you created, for example you made the [[18th Wolf Garrison (Clan Wolf)]] page but should it not be [[18th Garrison (Clan Wolf)]] to be inline with other clan unit pages? i.e [[5th Garrison (Clan Nova Cat)]], and [[5th Garrison (Clan Smoke Jaguar)]]--[[User:Deadfire|Deadfire]] ([[User talk:Deadfire|talk]]) 04:30, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
:::I use the correct speeling from FM:3145, its listed as 18th Wolf Garrison Cluster, but we dont add cluster in the page name! If iam wrong or not? If its not clear set please up a talk to Dark Jaguar.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 04:36, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
::::Having the additional "Wolf" in the page title just seems odd when you compare it to other clans unit pages, however I have set up a talk with him to see if we can get to the bottom of this. I'll let you know of our findings.--[[User:Deadfire|Deadfire]] ([[User talk:Deadfire|talk]]) 04:54, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
:::::Okidoki, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 04:56, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
  
(I've removed references and formatting here to show what I mean.)--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:16, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
+
== Touring the Stars ==
 +
Hi Doneve,<br>
 +
I've been pondering something lately that I thought I'd get your opinion on. The planets articles have a priority order when it comes to images for the planet infobox - if there's a flag, the flag goes in the image box, unless there's a picture of the world (like those in the ''Dark Age Republic Worlds (3130)'' sourcebook), in which case the picture of the world takes priority. How would you feel about us using the cover images from the ''Touring the Stars'' - cropped to show just the planet, without the titling, logos and so on? I'm not sure if it's possible to remove the name of the planet from the cover images, so there's a secondary question about whether to use them with the text on or not - but it struck me that with the ''TtS'' books giving us an actual picture of the planet - or most of the planet - we should maybe be using them. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:49, 30 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
::Absolutly, i use the ''Tts'' cover images on one or two planet articles shortly in the past and they work very well.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 01:52, 30 June 2016 (PDT)
 +
:::Hi Doneve,
 +
:::I hope you had a nice break? I'm off on holiday myself next month - and for the first time ever, I'm actually worried about whether I'll get enough exercise done while I'm on holiday. I must be getting old!
 +
:::I've started adding the images from the Touring the Stars ebooks to the planet articles as I work through each one - it's taking me a little while, but I'm getting there slowly. I can't capture a decent image of the planetary maps, though - I either get one where the image is truncated, or where the text ends up too small to be legible. Is there any chance you can get a decent copy of the single-page world map from TtS: Inglesmond for the [[Inglesmond]] article? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 22:55, 14 September 2016 (PDT)
  
:Hi Mbear, I'm the guilty party when it comes to the points being in the references for the Quirks. My thinking was that as I'm trying to avoid giving away enough mechanical rules detail to get us into trouble on the IPR front, I maybe didn't need to list the points cost overtly. I'm not actually giving things like the numbers for the bonuses and penalty modifiers to initiative, PSRs, to-hit rolls and the like, so that while readers can get an idea of what the Quirks do, the article doesn't replace actually buying Strategic Ops to learn the specifics. And, if they aren't getting the specifics for the other rules mechanics, it didn't really seem necessary to add the cost for the Quirks as well. I'm happy to change it, but I thought I'd explain my reasoning... I'm a little twitchy because I don't do much on the rules side of the wiki, being more a fluff person, but I used to be a mod on a wiki for Tau players in Warhammer 40K, and Games Workshop were strict to the point of fanatacism about IPR, copyright and trademarks, so I'm used to giving less detail rather than more. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 08:48, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
+
== Heiligendreuz ==
::Yep, BM found the right words, he is the only contributor for the fluff writing, i only created the main body page and make some little works, you know step by step iam working from but with great response, yes he becomes his award, i must stick a nail in the wound sorry BM {{Emoticon| ;) }}, thanks a lot to [BM] and [Mbear] for the great supporters to add missing thinks, etc. to sarna.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 18:59, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Hi Doneve,<br>
:::Just saw your notes about this. OK. It makes sense to me. But I don't think CGL will complain about it.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:04, 13 May 2013 (PDT)
+
I hope you're well? I've started trying to lose a lot of weight (over 100kgs) so I may be more active on here for a while as I distract myself from feeling hungry all the time {{ emoticon | ;) }}<br>
 +
I'm trying to update the article for Heiligendreuz, and one of the things I was looking at is trying to work out when it was conquered during REVIVAL. It looks like it was a Wolf world, but I don't have the Clan Wolf sourcebook here - could you possibly have a look in your copy and see if there's any mention of when it was captured, and how?<br>
 +
I originally through it might've been captured by someone else in the initial invasion and then captured by the Wolves later on, so I did some hunting through maps, and it looks as if this map: [[:File:CJF&CSV OZ 3052.jpg]] has ended up in the wrong area - it's labelled up as the Clan Jade Falcon and Clan Steel Viper OZ as at 3052, but it's actually the Clan Wolf OZ. If you're not busy, could you possibly upload the CSV/CJF 3052 map from ER:3052? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:57, 8 July 2016 (PDT)
 +
::Hi BM, yep i take a look in the Clan Wolf sourcebook, and yep i uploade the maps, give me a little bit time, iam on work {{emoticon|;)}}.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 02:02, 8 July 2016 (PDT)
  
== Suzaku & KCMC ==
+
== Sakhalin (CC) ==
Hello Doneve.  Wanted give you heads up on this article. Your already working on it.  1) PAGENAME things in the Suzaku, automaticly includes article's name so you don't have manually enter the name (unless they don't work anymore.) Replacing them in your copyediting is a waste. 2) KCMC: I know your king of doing Components.  However, KCMC was relocated per entry from TRO:P i just wrote up. I've not looked in the [[FM:3085]] see if its included in there as additional source. [[Objectives: Draconis Combine]] does not include because it was occupied by WoB. I'm not sure what should be included on newly relocated KCMC page since it doesn't note anything else being built there. The old Objective Raids is bit old. I won't get rid of the old stuff incase someone referring to it as pre-Jihad source. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 11:14, 11 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Hi Doneve,</br>
:Thanks for the info, i look what i can found in other sources about the Suzaku components and where there built.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:21, 11 April 2013 (PDT)
+
I hope you're well? This healthy eating regimen of mine has expanded to include trying to go swimming on a regular basis, and while I'm still building up to that, I've established that I move through the water with all the grace of the Titanic - while it was sinking! It does give me more time to think though, so I've been doing more work on here as a result. The longer I keep at it, the more chance I have of living long enough to do some travelling again, and there's a delightful woman in Hamburg I've been promising to visit for a while, plus I have another friend living near Neuschwanstein, so give me maybe three years, and it might be time for me to do a tour of Germany. Assuming I make it that long, I have every intention of dragging you out for a few beers, given the opportunity - so I thought I should warn you in plenty of time, to give you a chance to prepare {{ emoticon | ;) }}</br>
 +
On a more mundane note, do you have access to a copy of ''[[Operational Turning Points: Capellan Crusades]]''? It's one of the books I never bothered picking up (my interest in the Capellans is largely [[Age of War]] and earlier, but in updating the article here for [[Sakhalin (CC)]] I discovered a discrepancy - someone's cited OTP:CC in putting the number of planets in the system as 2 in the system box, but also cited it for naming the inhabited planet in the system as the 5th, which doesn't make sense. If you have a copy, could you possibly check the planetary information for Sakhalin to see what's going on? I also noticed that it listed both a Planetary Legate and a Planetary Governor in 3111, which suggests that it was a Republic of the Sphere system, but I can't find anything else to confirm that - the map of the war in ''[[Historical: Wars of the Republic Era]]'' shows it being attacked by the [[RAF]], but doesn't indicate if it was ever a member or not. I'm a little confused, as you can probably imagine... [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 23:48, 7 August 2016 (PDT)
 +
:Hi BM, all is well the coming days are busy prepare for the holidays and so on. A Germany tour {{ emoticon | :) }}, this was perfect you stard in Hamburg, then you move to Frankfurt then we can hang around drink some beer hehe and i can give you a little Frankfurt tour then you can move to Neuschwanstein {{ emoticon | ;) }}. Okidoki i check OTP:CC and let you know what i found.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 02:01, 8 August 2016 (PDT)
  
== Angus Mctavish ==
+
==Eridani Lawsuit talk page==
Hy Doneve,
+
Hi Doneve,
  
Does this article on [[Angus Mctavish]] sound like a legitimate character to you? I've got a nasty feeling it's someone adding their personal fanon character to Sarna, particularly as I'd expect the capitalisation of a legitimate Scottish surname to be McTavish, not Mctavish. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:16, 14 April 2013 (PDT)
+
You reverted Cray's comments and links to pertinent published legal documents on [[Talk:Eridani Light Horse lawsuit‎]], marking it as Spam. Was that deliberate? I think Cray's links were enlightening on the matter, and really belong into the article proper. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 05:20, 17 August 2016 (PDT)
:I have the same feeling as you, i datamined my sources when i see your talk on last day, but i found nothing at this time, i think its fanon!--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:19, 14 April 2013 (PDT)
+
:Upps sorry iam in holidays and checked sarna for a few minutes, i reverted my mistake.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 06:11, 17 August 2016 (PDT)
::I notice we get more fanon these days than we used to. I wonder what's causing that?
+
::Ah okay, just a mistake then. No worries then! :) [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 08:23, 17 August 2016 (PDT)
::Btw, if you find any more articles that need updating from the Age of War record sheets pack from TRO 3075, can you let me know? I've rather enjoyed adding the new variants for the spacecraft you flagged up yesterday or the day before. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:51, 15 April 2013 (PDT)
 
:::Which other fanon articles mean you? I added the deletion template to the [[Angus Mctavish]] article. Oh and thanks a lot for adding the missing variants from RS:3075UAoW, when i found more i talk to you. Now i work my way from the Cutting Edge RS.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:59, 15 April 2013 (PDT)
 
  
== Adler Malthus Pic ==
+
== Hacked ==
 +
Hi Doneve,<br>
  
Page 12 of [[The Battle for Twycross]] - can you upload this for me? :) [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 22:31, 15 April 2013 (PDT)
+
I'm in darkest Cornwall at the moment and don't have a lot of net access, but I saw your status update - what happened? Is there anything I can do to help? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:25, 12 October 2016 (PDT)
:Work in progress. ;).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 22:34, 15 April 2013 (PDT)
+
:Hi i send you a email.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 02:05, 13 October 2016 (PDT)
 +
::Doneve - You okay, man? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 22:05, 13 October 2016 (PDT)
 +
::I haven't seen an email yet, but I'm keeping my eyes open... [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 01:23, 14 October 2016 (PDT)
 +
:::Email is sendet.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 01:50, 14 October 2016 (PDT)
  
==XTRO:1945==
+
== Map ==
Hi Doneve, I think it would not be a good idea to add the real-world vehicles from XTRO:1945 to BTW! See detailed response on my talk page. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 03:52, 18 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Hi Doneve,<br>
 +
Do you know anyone who might have a large, hi-res version of the 2786 map as a single image and who'd be willing to share it? I'm contemplating a map project where I try and map out which systems changed hands in each year of the First Succession War, year by year, based on the descriptions and detail in the sourcebook. I know it's a daft idea, but... [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 14:49, 3 November 2016 (PDT)
 +
:Hi BM, i look what i can do, but iam not at home, tomorrow iam at home!--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 05:10, 4 November 2016 (PDT)
  
==CSR Snow Raven==
+
== FSW Deployments ==
Hy Doneve, I just added an image for the [[Snow Raven (Vessel)|CSR ''Snow Raven'']] (based on the assumption that it's in the Snow Raven section of ''[[Field Report: Clans]]'', and their WarShip fleet only includes the one ''McKenna'') - but I don't recognise the artists signature. As you're the guru of images here, if you recognise which artist it is, could you possibly add his details to the file? Thanks! [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:17, 23 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Hi Doneve,<br>
:Hy BM, the artist is [[Chris Lewis]], summary template is updated.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:31, 23 April 2013 (PDT)
+
I spotted something odd about the 1st Arcadian Cuirassiers deployment in the AFFS tables, which I asked a question about over on the CGL forums; Adrian Gideon has confirmed that there are some errors in the AFFS deployment table, which he's spelt out [http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=55353.msg1273515#msg1273515 here] - as you're powering through the deployment tables and updating planet articles, I thought you'd like to know {{ emoticon | :) }} [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 23:52, 10 November 2016 (PST)
::Thank you, much appreciated {{Emoticon| :) }} [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:47, 23 April 2013 (PDT)
+
:Ah, thanks for the info.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 04:46, 11 November 2016 (PST)
  
== Regarding Design Quirks ==
+
== Regulus ==
  
Doneve - Respectfully - I don't believe its necessary for every 'Mech to have a "Quirk" section that applies to only one particular variant. Its unneeded and burdensome on the article. This is not to say the information isn't valuable - it is. But it would be much better in my opinion to list the quirks in the already-existing variant section. This is just my opinion. Thanks. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 09:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
+
Afternoon, Doneve. Hope you are feeling well.
  
==Operation BULLDOG losses==
+
I had a user of Sarna contact me to say the [[:File:Regulus_Neighbors.png|location image]] for [[Regulus]] showed the wrong location for the planet. I was hoping I could convince you to confirm that and maybe grab/modify an appropriate one, if true. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:55, 20 November 2016 (PST)
Hy Doneve,<br>
+
:Hiya, i checked my maps and it is right the location is wrong, you know Nic created the images for the planets automaticly in the wake of sarna, i hope this helps, cheers.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 11:18, 20 November 2016 (PST)
I'm trying to work out which WarShips were lost during [[Operation Bulldog]], particularly the Draconis Combine WarShips, and I'm not having much luck with the sourcebooks. The closest I've found is in the closing section of The Dragon Roars, where it's stated that two ''Kyushu'', one ''Kirishima'' and one ''Tatsumaki'' were destroyed; Sarna has details recorded against some ships, but no references, so I can't check them. Are you aware of anything that lists the names of the ships that were destroyed? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 05:03, 8 May 2013 (PDT)
+
:: Thanks, mate. Yeah, I told the user that. But we can replace them with canon map images. I figured you might have one or the ability to modify one where Regulus is centered.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 13:40, 20 November 2016 (PST)
 +
:::Sorry for the late response, i can do this but not at this time, must look to beauty nurses.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 17:56, 12 December 2016 (PST)
 +
::::The long-term plan is still for me to generate loads of replacement map images when the planet articles are ready for them. Unfortunately, it's been 18 months and I'm still only a third of the way through updating the planet articles to the new format, so it's going to take a while... I could try doing Regulus as a test case, though. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 00:19, 13 December 2016 (PST)
  
== XTRO: Succession Wars Vol 1 ==
+
== Firgrove ==
 +
Hi Doneve,
  
Good evening Doneve.
+
I'm away from my TROs at the moment, but I've found something odd in the [[Firgrove]] planet article I'm hoping you could check out for me. The planet article lists a [[Geenock Flight Academy]] as a manufacturer, and a [[Greenock Aero Manufacturing, Ltd.]]. Objectives: Federated Suns has the Geenock Flight Academy listed, and mentions that it put the ancient ''[[Vulcan (aerospace fighter)|Vulcan]]'' fighter back into production during the Jihad. That made me wonder if Greenock Aero Manufacturing should actually be Geenock Aero Manufacturing, as the Greenock Aero Manufacturing page lists it as producing the ''[[Rondel]]'' and cites TRO:3145 Federated Suns as the source. However, when I look at the ''Vulcan'' article, it has a mention of the ''Vulcan'' being put back into production by Greenock Flight Academy, not Geenock Flight Academy, and cites TRO:3075 as the source. It could be that it really is Geenock Flight Academy and Greenock Manufacturing Ltd, but I suspect that either Geenock or Greenock is a typo - I can't check that without access to the TROs though, and I'll not be able to get at my copies until next week. Is there any chance you could take a look? The flight academy is going to need a manufacturing company article made up for it whatever we do, as they produced those ''Vulcans'' for at least a little while. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 04:06, 23 February 2017 (EST)
  
I was uploading some pictures to the site and noticed that most of the designs from the abovementioned XTRO are missing from it. I have the pictures, but I wanted to ask if it was allowed for me to post them as the entries for said mechs are already on the site and thought that it may have something to do with legal stuff behind it. When I asked, I was redirected to you as the man who knows the best when it comes to the pictures.
+
== System Coordinates naming question ==
  
So here I am asking if there's anything wrong with me adding images to the mechs from the XTRO: SW and linking them to the appropriate 'mech pages.
+
Doneve, I'm trying to get the band back together. Would you weigh in on [[BattleTechWiki_talk:System_coordinates#Re-engagement|this]], please? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 17:09, 2 August 2017 (EDT)
  
Thank you for your time and answer in advance. [[User:Adridos|Adridos]] ([[User talk:Adridos|talk]]) 12:53, 9 May 2013 (PDT)
+
== Hey Doneve ==
  
== Hey ==
+
Hey i recently came back to the wiki. Hope all is well with you. 09:16, 24 August 2019 (EDT)
  
Hey - We miss you! Hope all is well! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 23:35, 21 May 2013 (PDT)
+
== Hallo! ==
  
:I was also wondering that. Let us know you're OK! --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] ([[User talk:Rebs|talk]]) 00:36, 22 May 2013 (PDT)
+
Hello Doneve, I am trying to spend some more time finishing some projects for BTW and on the forums. And I was really hoping you might be around and are in good health.
 +
<br>
 +
Meine Mutter sagt mir oft, „Halt die Ohren steif!". Und Ihnen, auch! Halten Sie Ihren Ohren steif!--[[User:S.gage|S.gage]] ([[User talk:S.gage|talk]]) 00:18, 7 May 2020 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 09:39, 19 March 2021


Welcome

Welcome, Doneve, to BattleTechWiki!

We look forward to your contributions and want to help you get off to a good strong start. Hopefully you will soon join the army of BattleTech Editors! If you need help formatting the pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions go to the Help section or the FAQ. If you can't find your answer there, please ask an Admin.


Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the wiki:

  • For policies and guidelines, see The Five Core Policies of BattleTechWiki and the BTW Policies. Another good place to check out is our market of Projects, to see how the smaller communities within BTW do things in their particular niche areas.
  • Each and every page (articles, policies, projects, images, etc.) has its very own discussion/talk page, found on the tab line at the top of the page. This is a great place to find out what the community is discussing along that subject and what previous issues have already been solved.
  • If you want to play around with your new wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you. Don't worry: you won't break anything. A great resource for printing out is the Wiki Cheat Sheet.
  • If you're not registered, then please consider doing so. At the very least, you'll have a UserPage that you own, rather than sharing one with the community.
  • Also consider writing something about yourself on your UserPage (marked as "Doneve" at the top of the page, though only do this if you're registered). You'll go from being a 'redshirt' to a 'blueshirt,' with the respect of a more permanent member.
    • This is really helpful for the admins, as it gives your account that touch of "humanity" that assists us in our never-ending battle with spambots.
  • For your first few edits on the wiki, please do not add any URLs (which can be an indicator of SPAM).
  • Consider introducing yourself on our Discord server.
  • In your Preferences, under the edit tab, consider checking Add pages I create to my watchlist and Add pages I edit to my watchlist, so that you can see how your efforts have affected the community. Check back on following visits by clicking on watchlist.
  • If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random button in the sidebar, or check out the List of Wanted Pages. Or even go to Special Pages to see what weird stuff is actually tracked by this wiki.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the circled button in this image; this will automatically produce your name (or IP address, if you are editing anonymously) and the date.


Again, welcome to Sarna's BattleTechWiki!

*******Be Bold*******

Archives

User talk:Doneve/Archive1
User talk:Doneve/Archive2 April 2010-January 2011
User talk:Doneve/Archive3 January 2011-December 2011
User talk:Doneve/Archive4 January 2012-December 2012
User talk:Doneve/Archive5 January 2013-January 2014
User talk:Doneve/Archive6 January 2014-January 2015
User talk:Doneve/Archive7 January 2015-December 2015

Happy New Year

Hi Doneve,
I hope 2016 is a happy, prosperous and healthy year for you and your family. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:49, 3 January 2016 (PST)

Electra

Hi Doneve, I've just updated the article for Electra and I think something odd may be going on with the system tables. Electra, Maia and Merope are all named systems in the Pleiades Cluster, but while both Merope and the Pleiades Cluster appear in the systems table, Maia doesn't. I've only got a small part of the systems spreadsheet with me at work (the systems that begin with D, basically) so I can't check easily here, but could you take a look at your copy when it's sorted for Electra, and see how far away it lists Electra and Maia as being? It may be there's a bug in the spreadsheet. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2016 (PST)

Hu, a bug, ok, Maia has a distance from 1,1114 in my spreed sheet, when i sort to Electra.--Doneve (talk) 04:19, 28 January 2016 (PST)
Hiya, I think there may be another bug - I've just been looking at Elix, and it has Ashburton recorded as being 28.1 LY away. Elix is in the Draconis Combine though, and Ashburton's in the Free Worlds League. Looking at the map in ER: 2750, I think it should be Ashio rather than Ashburton, but it may mean that a row has gone missing from your copy of the spreadsheet, or maybe some of the data's ended up sorted out of sequence? I went and checked the Ashio page, as Ashio doesn't appear in Elix's system table, and on the Ashio page, Elix is listed as 28.2 LY away, so it should be there. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 03:20, 8 February 2016 (PST)
Arg, i see it, i have two copys of the spreadsheet and i used the wrong, sorry my failur grml grml :(.--Doneve (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2016 (PST)
Ah, no harm done. You should be more worried that I've stared at so many planet articles I'm starting to remember where every planet is, and yet I still can't remember what my own phone number is! BrokenMnemonic (talk) 04:00, 8 February 2016 (PST)
Ha ha ha, I know what you mean, i looked with my wife the Game of Throns series, and after this marathon i was so confused about the story, you know what i mean :).--Doneve (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2016 (PST)

Record Sheets 5: Vehicles

Umm, Doneve - we already have that article (and cover image) here: BattleTech Record Sheets Volume Five: Vehicles... Though I have no idea why there wasn't a redirect in place. Frabby (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2016 (PST)

Ups, please delete my new page.--Doneve (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2016 (PST)

Epsilon

Doneve - Can you upload the Epsilon Regiment insignia from Field Manual: Mercenaries, Revised ? Thanks! ClanWolverine101 (talk) 14:57, 11 March 2016 (PST)

Yep, i do this. Sorry for not answerd email, i do this next day.--Doneve (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2016 (PST)

Get well soon

Doneve - Sorry to hear you're going to the hospital. Get well soon! ClanWolverine101 (talk) 11:36, 17 March 2016 (PDT)

Planets Spreadsheet

Hi Doneve,
Do you want a copy of the spreadsheet I put together to make producing the nearest system tables a bit easier? It's not particularly elegant, but it saves a certain amount of time typing. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2016 (PDT)

Hi, i want absolutly ;) a copy, then i can go on to update the nearby systems table, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2016 (PDT)
I'm just home from a boardgames evening (unfortunately, the Thunderbirds crashed and burned, and the Hood probably went on to achieve world domination) and I've uploaded a copy of the spreadsheet here: http://www67.zippyshare.com/v/Ae5DOjBp/file.html - it's got the details for El Giza in it at the moment, as that's the last planet I worked on. If you use Volt's spreadsheet to identify the nearest neighbours, then copy and paste the nearby systems within 60 LY and the distances into the two populated columns on the left, the column on the far right then updates to the code for the bulk of the systems table. You still need to put the header and closing tag on it though, and it won't pick up things like redirects because it works off straight text. You also need to manually add ".0" to those jump distances that are an exact number of light years, as Excel wouldn't display a decimal of zero in a concatenated field for some reason. It saves me quite a bit of time when I'm updating articles - hope it helps. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 13:32, 19 April 2016 (PDT)
Thanks man, i look in it, if i have questions i set up a talk.--Doneve (talk) 13:36, 19 April 2016 (PDT)

Founder's Superior Editor of the Year Award 2014

Doneve, I'm constantly amazed at how much you help with both big and small changes to this wiki. Thank you for being such a great member of this community! Nicjansma (talk) 06:28, 25 May 2016 (PDT)

Hello to you to

Hey, I just saw the message on my talk page, and frankly I'm not so sure about data mining, but if you want some help adjusting those planet tables, I'd be more than happy to help! -BobTheZombie (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2016 (PDT)

Overview

Hi, I noticed you deleted the overview section on some of the units I've been working on. There are a lot of units with that section on Sarna and to be honest I think it looks so much better than having text sitting about the contents box. Dark Jaguar (talk) 15:55, 7 June 2016 (PDT)

Yep, i hope i dont step on your teeths, i use this format [<onlyinclude>] [</onlyinclude>] from User:Neufeld he provide this on some pages as example take a look here Donegal Guards, sadly he leave us, this code is only used for military unit pages and it works very well to include content as a top overview and after this we add h2 or h3 headers for the other infos, make this sense to you, sorry for my bad english...if its not clear to you please set up a talk to my friend BrokenMnemonic he clarify this.--Doneve (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
It's how I do my articles now as well, I learned after Doneve edited my formatting on my first couple new unit pages, and I just stuck doing that way.--Deadfire (talk) 17:47, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
Thanks, I think the expression is step on my feet and you're not. I was just looking for clarification. It's just that there seems to be no "template" page for military units. I've not seen the only include code before, but have seen overview as a section many times. The headings of the Donegal Guards page you showed doesn't comply with all other military units pages for the H2 headings, so I'm not sure if this is a good example to follow? Dark Jaguar (talk) 23:39, 7 June 2016 (PDT)
Looking around, I can't see a clear ruling or example - the onlyinclude code looks to be something that's been added as a good idea, rather than via consensus. An example of a page that uses it can be seen here: Federated Peacekeeping Forces. It's not perfect. The style in which individual pages are written, with the first mention of the article name in the text being placed in bold means that pages that incorporate the onlyinclude text end up with lots of bold in them, as that first mention is invariably inside the onlyinclude text. The principle of the onlyinclude text is sound - it allows brigade pages to pull in summary information from individual unit articles, updating automatically when the individual pages are updated, avoiding the problem of either things getting missed in higher-level pages when lower-level pages are updated, but it makes the format of higher-level pages inconsistent with the Manual of Style requirements for page formatting, as you end up with a lot of bold text, repeated links, and so on.
Without a clear ruling, I think we're probably best off having an editor's debate on whether to adopt or abandon the onlyinclude code, and in what format. A couple of the questions I think would need to be discussed are:
If we adopt the onlyinclude code as standard, should it be used in pages other than just military units? I know that Frabby is a fan of having a line of overview text at the top of every page (hence the summary sentence in all of the planets articles) but the number of instances of pages that pull through that onlyinclude text is currently pretty limited - the various major military organization pages are the only clear example I can think of at the moment. Do we want to incorporate onlyinclude tags into planet articles, if there's currently been no need for summary pages on planets that are aggregating together such information? Are we likely to see pages in the future that do look to pull through this information - summaries of corporations/businesses, planet summaries, etc?
Given the disruption to the consistency of the formatting, should the onlyinclude text be exempt from the standard formatting requirements such as linking the first instance of a linkable text, bolding the first mention of the article name, and so forth? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2016 (PDT)

Midway Shipyards

Hi Doneve I had a look, I don't have Objectives: Draconis Combine, but I changed a bit of the English so it reads more clearly. I don't think their will be any problems with plagiarism. Smiley.gif Dark Jaguar (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2016 (PDT)

Thanks a lot i want to add mor fluff stuff, and need a double checker is this ok to involve you on my pet project.--Doneve (talk) 14:33, 14 June 2016 (PDT)
Yes, not a problem. I'm happy to help. Dark Jaguar (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2016 (PDT)

Wolf Garrison Clusters

Hey Doneve, I was looking though the editing of the Clan Wolf Touman‎‎ page where you did some 3145 updates. However do we not follow the same clan unit naming structure as others when we make pages for Wolf Garrison Clusters? My example would be that shouldn't 5th Wolf Garrison (Clan Wolf) ‎be simply 5th Garrison (Clan Wolf)? --Deadfire (talk) 04:16, 26 June 2016 (PDT)

Hi, i dont updated the Clan Wolf Touman page, Dark Jaguar do this, i started always by adding missing units i found in the Wolf Empire Deployment tables in Field Manual: 3145 and i want to switch to Field Manual: Updates and Objective Raids, i checked 5th Garrison (Clan Wolf) and the correct name is 5th Wolf Garrison, cheers.--Doneve (talk) 04:23, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
Sorry I meant more the pages you created, for example you made the 18th Wolf Garrison (Clan Wolf) page but should it not be 18th Garrison (Clan Wolf) to be inline with other clan unit pages? i.e 5th Garrison (Clan Nova Cat), and 5th Garrison (Clan Smoke Jaguar)--Deadfire (talk) 04:30, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
I use the correct speeling from FM:3145, its listed as 18th Wolf Garrison Cluster, but we dont add cluster in the page name! If iam wrong or not? If its not clear set please up a talk to Dark Jaguar.--Doneve (talk) 04:36, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
Having the additional "Wolf" in the page title just seems odd when you compare it to other clans unit pages, however I have set up a talk with him to see if we can get to the bottom of this. I'll let you know of our findings.--Deadfire (talk) 04:54, 26 June 2016 (PDT)
Okidoki, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 04:56, 26 June 2016 (PDT)

Touring the Stars

Hi Doneve,
I've been pondering something lately that I thought I'd get your opinion on. The planets articles have a priority order when it comes to images for the planet infobox - if there's a flag, the flag goes in the image box, unless there's a picture of the world (like those in the Dark Age Republic Worlds (3130) sourcebook), in which case the picture of the world takes priority. How would you feel about us using the cover images from the Touring the Stars - cropped to show just the planet, without the titling, logos and so on? I'm not sure if it's possible to remove the name of the planet from the cover images, so there's a secondary question about whether to use them with the text on or not - but it struck me that with the TtS books giving us an actual picture of the planet - or most of the planet - we should maybe be using them. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:49, 30 June 2016 (PDT)

Absolutly, i use the Tts cover images on one or two planet articles shortly in the past and they work very well.--Doneve (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2016 (PDT)
Hi Doneve,
I hope you had a nice break? I'm off on holiday myself next month - and for the first time ever, I'm actually worried about whether I'll get enough exercise done while I'm on holiday. I must be getting old!
I've started adding the images from the Touring the Stars ebooks to the planet articles as I work through each one - it's taking me a little while, but I'm getting there slowly. I can't capture a decent image of the planetary maps, though - I either get one where the image is truncated, or where the text ends up too small to be legible. Is there any chance you can get a decent copy of the single-page world map from TtS: Inglesmond for the Inglesmond article? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2016 (PDT)

Heiligendreuz

Hi Doneve,
I hope you're well? I've started trying to lose a lot of weight (over 100kgs) so I may be more active on here for a while as I distract myself from feeling hungry all the time Wink.gif
I'm trying to update the article for Heiligendreuz, and one of the things I was looking at is trying to work out when it was conquered during REVIVAL. It looks like it was a Wolf world, but I don't have the Clan Wolf sourcebook here - could you possibly have a look in your copy and see if there's any mention of when it was captured, and how?
I originally through it might've been captured by someone else in the initial invasion and then captured by the Wolves later on, so I did some hunting through maps, and it looks as if this map: File:CJF&CSV OZ 3052.jpg has ended up in the wrong area - it's labelled up as the Clan Jade Falcon and Clan Steel Viper OZ as at 3052, but it's actually the Clan Wolf OZ. If you're not busy, could you possibly upload the CSV/CJF 3052 map from ER:3052? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2016 (PDT)

Hi BM, yep i take a look in the Clan Wolf sourcebook, and yep i uploade the maps, give me a little bit time, iam on work Wink.gif.--Doneve (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2016 (PDT)

Sakhalin (CC)

Hi Doneve,
I hope you're well? This healthy eating regimen of mine has expanded to include trying to go swimming on a regular basis, and while I'm still building up to that, I've established that I move through the water with all the grace of the Titanic - while it was sinking! It does give me more time to think though, so I've been doing more work on here as a result. The longer I keep at it, the more chance I have of living long enough to do some travelling again, and there's a delightful woman in Hamburg I've been promising to visit for a while, plus I have another friend living near Neuschwanstein, so give me maybe three years, and it might be time for me to do a tour of Germany. Assuming I make it that long, I have every intention of dragging you out for a few beers, given the opportunity - so I thought I should warn you in plenty of time, to give you a chance to prepare Wink.gif
On a more mundane note, do you have access to a copy of Operational Turning Points: Capellan Crusades? It's one of the books I never bothered picking up (my interest in the Capellans is largely Age of War and earlier, but in updating the article here for Sakhalin (CC) I discovered a discrepancy - someone's cited OTP:CC in putting the number of planets in the system as 2 in the system box, but also cited it for naming the inhabited planet in the system as the 5th, which doesn't make sense. If you have a copy, could you possibly check the planetary information for Sakhalin to see what's going on? I also noticed that it listed both a Planetary Legate and a Planetary Governor in 3111, which suggests that it was a Republic of the Sphere system, but I can't find anything else to confirm that - the map of the war in Historical: Wars of the Republic Era shows it being attacked by the RAF, but doesn't indicate if it was ever a member or not. I'm a little confused, as you can probably imagine... BrokenMnemonic (talk) 23:48, 7 August 2016 (PDT)

Hi BM, all is well the coming days are busy prepare for the holidays and so on. A Germany tour Smiley.gif, this was perfect you stard in Hamburg, then you move to Frankfurt then we can hang around drink some beer hehe and i can give you a little Frankfurt tour then you can move to Neuschwanstein Wink.gif. Okidoki i check OTP:CC and let you know what i found.--Doneve (talk) 02:01, 8 August 2016 (PDT)

Eridani Lawsuit talk page

Hi Doneve,

You reverted Cray's comments and links to pertinent published legal documents on Talk:Eridani Light Horse lawsuit‎, marking it as Spam. Was that deliberate? I think Cray's links were enlightening on the matter, and really belong into the article proper. Frabby (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2016 (PDT)

Upps sorry iam in holidays and checked sarna for a few minutes, i reverted my mistake.--Doneve (talk) 06:11, 17 August 2016 (PDT)
Ah okay, just a mistake then. No worries then! :) Frabby (talk) 08:23, 17 August 2016 (PDT)

Hacked

Hi Doneve,

I'm in darkest Cornwall at the moment and don't have a lot of net access, but I saw your status update - what happened? Is there anything I can do to help? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:25, 12 October 2016 (PDT)

Hi i send you a email.--Doneve (talk) 02:05, 13 October 2016 (PDT)
Doneve - You okay, man? ClanWolverine101 (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2016 (PDT)
I haven't seen an email yet, but I'm keeping my eyes open... BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:23, 14 October 2016 (PDT)
Email is sendet.--Doneve (talk) 01:50, 14 October 2016 (PDT)

Map

Hi Doneve,
Do you know anyone who might have a large, hi-res version of the 2786 map as a single image and who'd be willing to share it? I'm contemplating a map project where I try and map out which systems changed hands in each year of the First Succession War, year by year, based on the descriptions and detail in the sourcebook. I know it's a daft idea, but... BrokenMnemonic (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2016 (PDT)

Hi BM, i look what i can do, but iam not at home, tomorrow iam at home!--Doneve (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2016 (PDT)

FSW Deployments

Hi Doneve,
I spotted something odd about the 1st Arcadian Cuirassiers deployment in the AFFS tables, which I asked a question about over on the CGL forums; Adrian Gideon has confirmed that there are some errors in the AFFS deployment table, which he's spelt out here - as you're powering through the deployment tables and updating planet articles, I thought you'd like to know Smiley.gif BrokenMnemonic (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2016 (PST)

Ah, thanks for the info.--Doneve (talk) 04:46, 11 November 2016 (PST)

Regulus

Afternoon, Doneve. Hope you are feeling well.

I had a user of Sarna contact me to say the location image for Regulus showed the wrong location for the planet. I was hoping I could convince you to confirm that and maybe grab/modify an appropriate one, if true. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:55, 20 November 2016 (PST)

Hiya, i checked my maps and it is right the location is wrong, you know Nic created the images for the planets automaticly in the wake of sarna, i hope this helps, cheers.--Doneve (talk) 11:18, 20 November 2016 (PST)
Thanks, mate. Yeah, I told the user that. But we can replace them with canon map images. I figured you might have one or the ability to modify one where Regulus is centered.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 13:40, 20 November 2016 (PST)
Sorry for the late response, i can do this but not at this time, must look to beauty nurses.--Doneve (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2016 (PST)
The long-term plan is still for me to generate loads of replacement map images when the planet articles are ready for them. Unfortunately, it's been 18 months and I'm still only a third of the way through updating the planet articles to the new format, so it's going to take a while... I could try doing Regulus as a test case, though. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2016 (PST)

Firgrove

Hi Doneve,

I'm away from my TROs at the moment, but I've found something odd in the Firgrove planet article I'm hoping you could check out for me. The planet article lists a Geenock Flight Academy as a manufacturer, and a Greenock Aero Manufacturing, Ltd.. Objectives: Federated Suns has the Geenock Flight Academy listed, and mentions that it put the ancient Vulcan fighter back into production during the Jihad. That made me wonder if Greenock Aero Manufacturing should actually be Geenock Aero Manufacturing, as the Greenock Aero Manufacturing page lists it as producing the Rondel and cites TRO:3145 Federated Suns as the source. However, when I look at the Vulcan article, it has a mention of the Vulcan being put back into production by Greenock Flight Academy, not Geenock Flight Academy, and cites TRO:3075 as the source. It could be that it really is Geenock Flight Academy and Greenock Manufacturing Ltd, but I suspect that either Geenock or Greenock is a typo - I can't check that without access to the TROs though, and I'll not be able to get at my copies until next week. Is there any chance you could take a look? The flight academy is going to need a manufacturing company article made up for it whatever we do, as they produced those Vulcans for at least a little while. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 04:06, 23 February 2017 (EST)

System Coordinates naming question

Doneve, I'm trying to get the band back together. Would you weigh in on this, please? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 17:09, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

Hey Doneve

Hey i recently came back to the wiki. Hope all is well with you. 09:16, 24 August 2019 (EDT)

Hallo!

Hello Doneve, I am trying to spend some more time finishing some projects for BTW and on the forums. And I was really hoping you might be around and are in good health.
Meine Mutter sagt mir oft, „Halt die Ohren steif!". Und Ihnen, auch! Halten Sie Ihren Ohren steif!--S.gage (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2020 (EDT)